CSS violation and pseudo class

Hello everyone I've been working on a personnal character sheet and I've been using the pseudo class ":has" to handle tabulations and some other styles as I've not seen it in the security filtering. An example : .inventory-tabs:not ( :has ( input [ value = "Armors" ] :checked ))~ .inventory-shifting .armors , .inventory-tabs:not ( :has ( input [ value = "Weapons" ] :checked ))~ .inventory-shifting .weapons {      display : none ; } Another example of where I'm using this pseudo-class : .itemcontrol:has ( .repcontrol_move ) { height : 26px ;     margin : 0px ; } But it seems that this pseudo class isn't passing the security filtering. Am I wrong or is this an oversight of the limitations ? Or maybe my "Potential CSS security violations" is coming from something else ?

It's coming from something else, but be aware that :has is not recommended as Firefox does not support it. That may not be an issue for your personal sheet, but something to keep in mind.

Would you know what it would be in the first bit of code I showed ? Whenever I erase every :has from the CSS, the security violation disappear so I'm a bit confused

I don't see anything, which probably means it's a hidden character captured by copy/paste of something (or I'm just tired and missing it). I can guarantee that it is not the :has pseudo class though. I've used it for testing some stuff for when it (hopefully) eventually becomes well supported. If you're using my Roll20 auto code uploader chrome extension, it should give you a warning about which problematic character specifically is in your css.

Can you link your extension ? It would really be helpful And thanks for your quickness buddy

OK I found where the error came from, the character "É" was wandering around somewhere Issue closed then

Here's the extension . It automates uploading code to your sheet sandbox. And congratulations on finding it. The accented characters are a weird inclusion in the security filtering I sometimes forget about.

Scott C. said: It's coming from something else, but be aware that :has is not recommended as Firefox does not support it. That explains why it's unfamilair to me. It sounds useful though.