!emas bugs

The !emas script seems to have several bugs when inline rolls are used. 1) If used for exampled inside of a button on a character sheet like !emas würfelt [KON(Basis)] [[@{kon_basis}d6sacs5cs6>5]] it will initiate two rolls instead of one like /em would. 2) If used in conjunction with the tracker it seems to not send the final result displayed in the chat (with /em it works)

Yeah, it's a bit of a hack. I'm not sure it's worth putting the effort into it to make it work 100% correctly. Is it useful to you, or just a curiousity?

I am not absolutely sure. Is there any other way to get a similar formatting? I hate the superlong formatting of /roll an /gmroll which is why i use only inline rolls with emotes to associate the roll to the character as the chatformatting is also kind of not that good compared to "Vago rolls for [TEST] [[inline roll]]" I am only able to get this with /em as far as I understood and em is only available for GMs as far as I understood it.

/emas (which lets you specify who the source is) is only available to GMs, but /em (which uses you as the source) is available to anyone. So if someone with Vago selected in their "as" dropdown does "/em rolls for [TEST] [[inline roll]]" you'll get what you want.

Yeah but if "Vago" is a summoner with a "fire elemental 5" and a "water elemental 4" this means i either have to use "Vago" for all the rolls, can't build macros around @{selected|token_name{ or would have to create one character per summon and then select the that summon in the "as" box. I think the /em will be sufficient, and it is not that important to put more effort into it. I just don't get why they blocked the /emas command for players.

It would be nice if there was a way to turn on allowing /emas for players. It's a common enough request, someone should make a suggestion for it...

There was in the old suggestions forum.

Also Aaron, you could just steal the buildInline/process roll functions from PowerCards and add them to the !emas script.

Ah, thanks for the offer HB, I might just do that. :)

The Aaron said: Ah, thanks for the offer HB, I might just do that. :) Ah one caveat, I'm in the process of re-writing it actually...

Yeah, I saw that. =D I've been meaning to write a drop-in function for that for a while, as I'd like to provide it in a bunch of scripts.