Not to come off as snide, but isn't complaining about the the prices of additional (key word here, additional. no requirement, no obligation) features in a free service kind of trite?
Sure, if the price was reasonable, the complaint was absurd, and this wasn't a business.
I mean.. when the kickstarter was up and running, would we have stood around and said things like "25$ as a contributor? why the heck would I pay for something like this when I (from my standpoint) get nothing.. and I could get a DDI subscription (or insert whatever) instead?"
This argument does not make sense. I'm not even sure what your point is. Can you explain?
the fact of the matter is, people who want to make use of the alpha releases, and some extra space, will pay the premium to be contributors, no questions asked, and likely - no complaints at it. Why? because they're probably similarly minded to the people that shelled out cash months before the service took off, just at the thought of what a service like this could really provide.
And I'm not complaining about that. Actually, the $9.99 tier is almost worth it due to the development server access alone (if they can keep the alpha features interesting and useful). It's the $4.99 tier that I am complaining about. That may not have been clear.
Me? I'm not GM'ing yet, so I'll probably stick free. but in a couple months? 5$ a month if I'm running a few games? *so I drink one less cup of fair-trade coffee this month, poor me*
And for your $5 a month you're only getting a gig. In other places that gig would cost you as little as 5 cents. On Google the same $5 would get you 100GB and an extra 25GB in your Gmail account.
See, it's not about the cost by itself. It's the cost relative to what we're getting. The last time a single GB cost $5 was about ten years ago .
I would be perfectly fine with paying $5 if I was getting something close to being worth $5. Even marginally close would be fine.
bottom line - This is a great service,
Yes it is. I never said it wasn't.
and like any free service, it comes with limitations.
And I am not complaining about those limits. Those are reasonable and understandable.
and like any other free service, there are options that come at premiums.
Of course, but it is the comparison to other places that host content that make the absurdity of trying to offer 1GB for $5 evident.
Only you can decide if shelling out the cash for those, but claiming their *actual* values against the userbase? not so much.
Keep up the good work Roll20