
Hi! Right now, me and my DM are attempting to create a macro that allows us to combine Multiattacking and Targeting, so that we can target multiple creatures to get AC/Reflex/Fort/Will/Etc values. Here's what we have right now, based on the 4e power Winged Horde: &{template:dnd4epower} {{atwill=1 }} {{name=@{power-1-name} }} {{type=At-Will }} {{keywords=Arcane, Illusion, Implement, Psychic }} {{action=Standard }} {{multiattacktoggle=[[?{Number of Attacks|2}]]}} {{range=Area burst 1 within 10 }} {{target=Each enemy in burst }} {{multiattack1=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target1|Will}]] }} {{multiattack2=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target2|Will}]] }} {{multiattack3=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target3|Will}]] }} {{multiattack4=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target4|Will}]] }} {{multiattack5=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target5|Will}]] }} {{multiattack6=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target6|Will}]] }} {{multiattack7=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target7|Will}]] }} {{multiattack8=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs. [[@{target|Target8|Will}]] }} {{multiattack9=[[1d20+@{power-1-attack}]] vs.[[@{target|Target9|Will}]] }} {{damage=[[1d6+@{weapon-1-enh}]] psychic damage. }} {{critical=[[6+@{weapon-1-enh}d@{weapon-1-per-plus}]] psychic damage. }} {{hiteffect=The target cannot take opportunity actions until the end of your next turn. }} The problem: The order of operations has targeting comes BEFORE the multiattack. So, how this works right now is: You select 9 targets. You are asked how many people you would like to target. The appropriate number of attacks are rolled. (So, in practice, if I were attacking 4 targets, I would click 4 targets, then click one pog 5 additional times, then say I want 4 targets, and it would then roll 4 attacks.) What we want: You are asked how many targets you want. You click that many targets. It rolls that many attacks. (I'm attacking 3 targets. I click 3 targets. It rolls 3 attacks.) The macro is, at this time, functional, but it's a bit annoying. If someone could help us out, we'd appreciate it.