[LFG] Any day of the week except saturday, many systems.

Hello everyone and tahnk you for taking the time to read this post. I'm a 33 years old player from Portugal and I've been roleplaying since I was 18. In reality before that but that's when I actually started dedicating some time into it. Recently most of my games have been droping out, either because of players leaving or GMs no longer having the time to continue doing it so I'm looking for some games to fill in the days I have free. Starting with the easy part, as said in the title, I have all days but saturday up for grabs, as for my timezone, I'm GMT and I'm up for a game that starts anywhere between 7pm and 11pm (I may possibly accept a game that starts later, but it has to in someway speak so close to my heart that I just cannot say no). Now for systems, plenty of systems I can do. Some systems I know include D&D 5e, savage worlds, some of the warhammer 40k systems, star wars saga, pathfinder. these is not all the systems I know, just some examples. Systems I don't really want include FATE and the warhammer 40k systems. I am willing to learn a system I don't know provided you have a copy of the PDFs being used that you can share. However there are a few things I should explain about the systems. I tend to like systems which have good hard fixed rules, especially if the GM does not intend to just change them. There are 2 considerations for me in a system. Does it have a good amount of rules that allows me to always know whether I can do something or not rather than being left to GM discretion (this creates a consistent experience from game to game) and does it have plenty of customisation without being a huge bloat of things that make getting into it difficult (I'm looking at pathfinder for too much stuff and fate for nearly nothing). Some people will of course say that a system doesn't needs many rules to be good and that it's all to the player capacity to roleplay. My view is that this is factually wrong. A good roleplayer is going to be a good roleplayer regardless of the system. What makes a system good is how solid it's rules are. Now there are a few things I'm not looking for in a game, these mostly regard settings. I don't like horror settings, westerns, or modern. I also dislike the idea of sanity systems or games where the fun is being constantly without resources. What i like are games that are sci-fi, post apocaliptic, or high fantasy where the character is actually considered to be someone who stands a head above the masses, they can be heroes villains, whatever, they do are the stuff legends are made of. While the narrative may focus more on the campaign than the characters, the characters play an important part, they are just not one more guy that happened to be slightly more competent. And in general that is it. I expect to have fun in the game that you run. No more, no less. From other players I expect only the basic ability to cooperate and not stab others in the back, steal from the party etc, those things ruin the fun for me. From the GM, I expect as said earlier, rules to be followed and not change for whatever convinience at the time and I expect a GM that is a fan of the players. That is, he tries to work with the players and try to get everyone to have fun instead of what I sadly see the most in 5e games where it's players vs gm and inevitably the game ends up failing or at least ceasing to be fun at some point or another. I also expect a certain degree of fairness where every player is treated equally. That is to say, not one player tends to get more stuff for him than other because that's what happens to be there or a difference in XP between players because someone roleplays better or worst. In my experience someone roleplaying better or worse will only increase the difference between players XP and thus levels as well as not really help with this eve changing, not only that but players who are left behind feel left out and tend to quit, not to mention that not all characters are the same, meaning not all characters, whether by personality or the utility of how they are mechanically built lends to the same amount of roleplay opportunities. And I suppose that is all. I hope to get a few invites for some games soon. Thanks for your time once again.

<a href="https://app.roll20.net/lfg/listing/32382/3-dot-5-l" rel="nofollow">https://app.roll20.net/lfg/listing/32382/3-dot-5-l</a>... Hello there after reading your text I do belive my campaign offer all you ask about here is the good and bad, I assume you know 3.5 DnD since your an old player. we don't take in new players at 3.5 tho can take in pathfinders cause many parts are the same Good: I stick to the rules. allso why i don't give rollplay xp, i don't want to favor some players. it's human to want to reward people more if you know them longer so I do what i can not to put my self in a place where my personal judgment can put me in some situation. I don't favor some players with more loot then others. but that beaing sad most encounters are mele so that kinda favors mele builds.&nbsp; you say you dislike games where "the party are constantly without resources." this is not the case in my world it's high magic so anyshop keeper with a building have way more gold then normal. this allso mean that if you go up to a innkeeper and put down a gold corn it's not going to give you much if any infomation cause it's so little. but if you give 1 gold to someone sitting on the ground with a blanket and some fruit there selling the 1 g coin will do the trick. in short expect there to be more loot then normal and offcourse the party do like to sell stuff and split the coins. I give you people very powerfull char building rule 52 stats buy and doubble feats from leveling and max hp on all levels. so you don't need to cheese in my campaign to have to freedom to rollplay without being killed. Bad: it is gm vs players. while i don't make encounter ment to kill players but after the encounter is made and there facing it then if the personalitys of that encounter wants to kill the players then i try to do so. I don't fudge dices or let things slide. how ever if i forget stuff or did something wrong i make the result in players favor. players are allowed to steal form and kill other party members. I don't stop it but i don't encurage it eighter. but we been playing since level 3 and there 10 now around a year and nobody have tryed to steal or kill anyone yet. so while i don't see it happening in the near future i just want to let you know that i can happen. for the last I will say that me the gm are allso in gmt time im from denmark so im in gmt+1 and im allmost allways on skype(that we use) and if not me then someone else in the campaign can proberly answere a question. magic is not my strong knowlede when you ask complicated combination of what if. but the rest im good at. currenty 2 opening in the campaign should anyone else read this. I perf people just add me on skype mine is Defiantbotf&nbsp; &nbsp;but you can allso just send me a pm if you have some questions you want to ask here insted of oer skype. assuming you can play when we play 7:20 pm gmt +1 and 4 hours

I appreciate that offer but I'll have to pass. 3.5 is in many ways like pathfinder as you said, one such ways&nbsp; is that it has way too much clutter. It has so many expantions that trying to make a character is basically a nightmare. That is why I only played pathfinder a couple times and said no more. Making a character is not a pleasant thing especially so when you are trying to make something that is good, but not broken. That is why I want a system that is well ruled, but not a huge mess of options where making a character is such a nightmare. I also think you misunderstood what I mean of players vs gm. What I mean is cases where all the player's try to do is break anything the dm did and all the dm does is try to deny the players anything they want. Hard combats are not really players vs dm since the dm still has the duty to put challenges in front of the players... It's only a problem if the dm starts making fights with things made specifically to deny any advantages the players may have aquired.

Bump.