Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×
Create a free account

so...im thinkin of starting up my 3rd Pathfinder campaign and...

1390340280

Edited 1390343899
Im wanting to see if folks would be interested in something like this. Day and Start time: 8AM (PST time) Every Wednesday Prologue Adventure (Tomorrow (IF i get the slots filled with at least 1 healer) otherwise Game will officially start Next Week Wednesday Language: English Session Length: at a minimum of 3hours (up to a maximum of 5hours) Must Have Skype Must be able to TALK and Listen rulebooks used Core, APG (3Traits max with 1Flaw) ARG (Basic Core Races Only) UM (Magus Class, Spells and Feats Only) UC (Spells/Feats and Equipment Only) House Rules: Donning Armor = 1 round per AC not minutes Natural 20's are automatic criticals Natural 1's are fumbles and causes the target to gain an immediate action to take an attack of opportunity Light and Heavy Crossbows shot at the range of 10ft are touch attack based (to show they rip through armor) Shooting into Melee -4 is "Optional" if the modifier is added to the attack roll, there is no chance other party members within melee reach of the target can be hit, however if it is not taken, there is an equal chance to hit other targets within 5ft of the intended target. Setting: City Adventures (mostly) the group would be looking at alley fights, sewer delving, spelunking and overland travel. Alignment of Party: Moderately on the bad side but not so evil that you just kill people for the fun of it. (think mafia family) Concept of the game: Thumbs is looking to expand his "business" a bit to start including a new block in the city of Riddleport and has hired the group to do the collections for him. Starting Location: Riddleport Starting Level : 1st level Point Buy System: 20points Total Party #: 5 (cleric or oracle required and priority goes to them for slots) So...before you all get excited here's what I need from you A back story and character concept that ties into riddleport (no made men/women (although a desire to be one is fine) no sons/daughters of kings, no whole family died to dragon attacks, etc) character concepts have to be in before Tuesday ( i create macros for tokens within the game and i need time to do that) <a href="https://app.roll20.net/lfg/listing/11366/campaign-75-percent-urban-setting-pathfinder" rel="nofollow">https://app.roll20.net/lfg/listing/11366/campaign-75-percent-urban-setting-pathfinder</a>
Is the first session tomorrow?
edited thread to reflect question above
I am totally interested in this! I will provide the necessary criteria when around 10 PM EST! Oh! I almost forgot; how long do you plan on your sessions to run?
edited thread to reflect question above
1390345059

Edited 1390345091
Aagghh! I would be a dead weight in that game due to the 3 hour minimum. My shift starts three hours after the game starts. :( I'll refrain from trying to join to prevent future issues. I hope it's a wonderful game!
Why the need for a dedicated healbot? PF isn't WoW.
you certainly do not have to play one if you do not want to. that's entirely your choice. Feel free to run your game how you want =) Enjoy your day
1390348384

Edited 1390348456
That's...some mighty big assumptions you made there about the reason I was asking. Let's try that again...why the requirement for a dedicated healbot? Or am I misreading a suggestion as a requirement?
I'd prefer if the group make up had either a cleric and or an oracle in the party. Hence the requirement label
1390373560

Edited 1390373578
You realize you didn't actually answer the question right? I'm trying to get you to explain the underlying reason for that preference. Is it story related?
move on but thanks for bumpin the thread.
Hello, i would be interested in joining if its not too late.
What type of character are you thinking about Flavius?
Cleric would be fine, not sure how it would fit a gangster theme though :P
Darn... too bad it's PST based. I could have been a cleric :(
Fulcrum said: move on but thanks for bumpin the thread. Ahem. I'm really curious now about this requirement, but I'm even more curious about why you're being so evasive. Why is this a difficult question to answer?
1390422138

Edited 1390422162
Will the Great said: Fulcrum said: move on but thanks for bumpin the thread. Ahem. I'm really curious now about this requirement, but I'm even more curious about why you're being so evasive. Why is this a difficult question to answer? Why is it s big deal to you ? Your first post was a baiting question to start an argument and instead of falling for it, he is ignoring you, and for good reason. And before you say it wasn't a baiting question, you basically said that his decision for his own campaign is wrong because a healbot "shouldn't" be required (which in and of itself is a derogatory term for a cleric/oracle, implying all they can do is heal). Would you also go to any DM looking for players saying that they have to be good aligned and demand why they have to be good aligned, using the excuse that "there are 9 alignments, you don't HAVE to be a hero in pathfinder"? It is his campaign and he has his own requirements for it, and he doesn't need to explain why to you, especially if you aren't even in it.
I would be interested, but the "All nat 1s are fumbles" seems pretty cruel to martial characters. I would think that casting haste as a wizard would increase my martial character's ability, not turn them into a slapstick comedy show
In regards to Flaws, are these the correct Flaws to use <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/buildingCharacte" rel="nofollow">http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/buildingCharacte</a>...
I'm guessing he means traits and drawbacks. You can normally have 2 traits, or 3 if you take a drawback. Yes? <a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/traits" rel="nofollow">http://www.d20pfsrd.com/traits</a>
David M. said: Will the Great said: Fulcrum said: move on but thanks for bumpin the thread. Ahem. I'm really curious now about this requirement, but I'm even more curious about why you're being so evasive. Why is this a difficult question to answer? Why is it s big deal to you ? Your first post was a baiting question to start an argument and instead of falling for it, he is ignoring you, and for good reason. And before you say it wasn't a baiting question, you basically said that his decision for his own campaign is wrong because a healbot "shouldn't" be required (which in and of itself is a derogatory term for a cleric/oracle, implying all they can do is heal). Would you also go to any DM looking for players saying that they have to be good aligned and demand why they have to be good aligned, using the excuse that "there are 9 alignments, you don't HAVE to be a hero in pathfinder"? It is his campaign and he has his own requirements for it, and he doesn't need to explain why to you, especially if you aren't even in it. You'll note the OP specified the need for a healer, not a cleric/oracle. Whether it's derogatory to refer to a cleric/oracle as "healer" or "healbot" is beside the point; I was quoting the OP. With regards to alignment, yes, if I saw a campaign I was interested in that specified a requirement for all Good alignments I would inquire as to the reason for it. I don't think that's unreasonable at all, and I don't appreciate your attempts to characterize my questions as demanding, baiting, or trying to start an argument.
THANKS, I could not find Flaws in the <a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.d20pfsrd.com</a>
Will the Great said: David M. said: Will the Great said: Fulcrum said: move on but thanks for bumpin the thread. Ahem. I'm really curious now about this requirement, but I'm even more curious about why you're being so evasive. Why is this a difficult question to answer? Why is it s big deal to you ? Your first post was a baiting question to start an argument and instead of falling for it, he is ignoring you, and for good reason. And before you say it wasn't a baiting question, you basically said that his decision for his own campaign is wrong because a healbot "shouldn't" be required (which in and of itself is a derogatory term for a cleric/oracle, implying all they can do is heal). Would you also go to any DM looking for players saying that they have to be good aligned and demand why they have to be good aligned, using the excuse that "there are 9 alignments, you don't HAVE to be a hero in pathfinder"? It is his campaign and he has his own requirements for it, and he doesn't need to explain why to you, especially if you aren't even in it. You'll note the OP specified the need for a healer, not a cleric/oracle. Whether it's derogatory to refer to a cleric/oracle as "healer" or "healbot" is beside the point; I was quoting the OP. With regards to alignment, yes, if I saw a campaign I was interested in that specified a requirement for all Good alignments I would inquire as to the reason for it. I don't think that's unreasonable at all, and I don't appreciate your attempts to characterize my questions as demanding, baiting, or trying to start an argument. Alright, I apologize on the healer thing, you are right about that. As for the alignment thing, if the DM told you to move on, he obviously doesn't have any desire to explain himself, so continuing to ask him to after the fact can easily come across as combative/argumentative.
Point taken. I apologize for derailing the thread - at least it got some free bumps I guess.