[HELP] Inputs in repeating sections disappearing?

So I'm attempting to throw together a character sheet, but I'm having some trouble. For some reason, if I try to fill in anything in any of the inputs in my repeating section, they automatically get cleared as soon as I click away or try to make a new repeating section. <fieldset class = "repeating_abilities"> <table> <tr> <td class = "ab-name"><input name = "attr_abilityname"></td> <td class = "ab-roll"> <select name = "attr_abilityroll"> <option>1d6</option> <option>2d6k1</option> <option selected>2d6</option> <option>3d6k2</option> <option>3d6</option> </select> </td> <td class = "ab-range"><input name = "attr_abilityrange"></td> <td class = "ab-effect"><textarea name = "attr_abilityeffect"></textarea></td> <td class = "ab-condition"><textarea name = "attr_abilitycondition"></textarea></td> </tr> </table> </fieldset> This doesn't seem to affect any other elements in the repeating row, just inputs. Help? I've checked to make sure that they're not sharing names with any other element on the sheet, so I genuinely have no idea.

your inputs need a type (text, number, radio, checkbox, or hidden). in addition, I'm not sure if those spaces around the ='s will cause issues. EDIT: I would also recommend that you take a look at the new character sheet standards that Cassie has been working on. Tables are a less than desirable way to format your sheet.

Gotcha. How would you recommend arranging layouts of more than three columns, if not by using tables? The <3colrow> approach doesn't work with more than three, obviously- it just overflows instead of arranging them neatly as desired, which the table layout does do.

Marth Lowell said: Gotcha. How would you recommend arranging layouts of more than three columns, if not by using tables? The <3colrow> approach doesn't work with more than three, obviously- it just overflows instead of arranging them neatly as desired, which the table layout does do. CSS grid is the answer.

Yep, or flexbox if perfect columns aren't essential. Actually for your use here, flexbox is probably better.