Macro with a Minimum 1

So I am trying to create a Macro/Query for one of my attacks. In case the image isn't clear: -[[?{Power Attack|Yes,1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4))]] +[[ ?{ Destined Strike |No,0|Yes,1}*(floor(@{class-0-level}/2)) ]] I need destined strike to score as a minimum of 1; currently while at level 1, this macro does not work as it rounds down to 0. Minimum I believe is 'kh1' but, I don't know how to write it like that. In case you were wondering the Pathfinder rule in question is At 1st level, as a free action up to three times per day you can grant yourself an insight bonus equal to 1/2 your bloodrager level (minimum 1) on one melee attack. At 12th level, you can use this ability up to five times per day. Can anybody help?

Try -[[ ?{Power Attack|Yes,1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4)) ]] + [[ {?{Destined Strike|No,0|Yes,1}*(floor(@{class-0-level}/2)),1}kh1 ]]

Vince said: Try -[[ ?{Power Attack|Yes,1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4)) ]] + [[ {?{Destined Strike|No,0|Yes,1}*(floor(@{class-0-level}/2)),1}kh1 ]] Doesn't seem to work. Here are the Macro scores with each combination Power Attack-Yes / Destined Strike-Yes = +0 - Correct Power Attack-Yes / Destined Strike-No = +0 - Incorrect (-1) Power Attack-No / Destined Strike-Yes = +1 - Correct Power Attack-No / Destined Strike-No = +1 - InCorrect Seems like Destined Strike is giving me +1 whether it is toggled on or off

My grouping for the comparison was not right... this should work.  I also move the "-" into the power attack query.  My thought was that if you have No power attack and a destined strike, the macro's mod would look like "-0+1" which might get interpreted as "-1" instead of "+1"...  didn't test, but I think using "-1" for yes within the power attack query works fine either way.  [[ ?{Power Attack|Yes,-1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4)) ]] + [[ ?{Destined Strike|No,0|Yes,1}*( ({floor(@{class-0-level}/2),1)}kh1 ) ]]

Vince said: My grouping for the comparison was not right... this should work.  I also move the "-" into the power attack query.  My thought was that if you have No power attack and a destined strike, the macro's mod would look like "-0+1" which might get interpreted as "-1" instead of "+1"...  didn't test, but I think using "-1" for yes within the power attack query works fine either way.  [[ ?{Power Attack|Yes,-1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4)) ]] + [[ ?{Destined Strike|No,0|Yes,1}*( ({floor(@{class-0-level}/2),1)}kh1 ) ]] So close but, it turned my power attack in my damage output to negative but, thanks to your help, I managed to get it to work with this: -[[?{Power Attack|Yes,1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4))]] + [[ ?{Destined Strike|No,0|Yes,1}*( ({floor(@{class-0-level}/2),1)}kh1 ) ]]

Tristan C. said: [[ ?{Power Attack|Yes,-1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4)) ]] + [[ ?{Destined Strike|No,0|Yes,1}*( ({floor(@{class-0-level}/2),1)}kh1 ) ]] So close but, it turned my power attack in my damage output to negative but, thanks to your help, I managed to get it to work with this:  -[[?{Power Attack|Yes,1|No,0}*(1+floor(@{bab}/4))]] + [[ ?{Destined Strike|No,0|Yes,1}*( ({floor(@{class-0-level}/2),1)}kh1 ) ]] Forgot about using the same query for both attack and damage.  My bad. Glad you got it worked out.  cheers