Macro Problem Question

I am playing 13th age, and in the powers in the character sheet there is a description box and a macro box. In the description you can put the macros however i ran into a snag. If i put in a macro for multiple d20 rolls all the d20 rolls are the exact same number as the first d20. Also if i have another roll macro before the d20 rolls they become that number also.  For example if i set it to roll a 1d4 for target and it rolls a 3 all the d20 rolls come up as 3. Does anybody know a way to fix this or is it because these aren't in the macro box?

Show us your macro.

OK i was wrong the d20's are rolling different numbers, it's the showing of the natural number is the same for each attack. **Attack1 **[[[[1d20ro=2]]+@{DEX-mod}+@{level}+@{tracker|Escalation}+1]] with a natural roll of $[[0]]! **Attack 2 **[[[[1d20ro=2]]+@{DEX-mod}+@{level}+@{tracker|Escalation}+1]] with a natural roll of $[[0]]! **Attack 3 **[[[[1d20ro=2]]+@{DEX-mod}+@{level}+@{tracker|Escalation}+1]] with a natural roll of $[[0]]! And if i throw in this before that they show whatever it roles as seen below **Target** [[1d3]]

Try $[[1]] instead. Just a guess but it appears the $[[0]] is capturing the first roll of your macro and you need to capture the 2nd roll. May need to continue down the sequence. However, note that this format is technically available to use in certain aspects, it's not supported in Roll20.

Those $[[0]] callbacks are indexed over the entire macro sent to chat. So you probably want $[[0]], $[[2]], $[[4]] or something - though the order can get pretty messed up. Once there's a few nested rolls in there, R20 does a bit of a drunken stagger to the finish line. There's a ton of posts in Stupid Tricks if you still need more info.

Hm, when I ran the three lines (only) as listed in a macro, I got the correct result, as they are three separate commands (with one roll each). Is this maybe some weirdness with the template being used?

I think it operates on a 'by line' basis and since templates are technically a single line you'd need to use the ids as Oosh suggested... as three lines, even when sent at the same time, it makes sense that each line has it's own $[[0]] reference... Of course with emergent functionality all bets are off anyway!

Yeah they'll work as separate lines, but not in a template as OP has them, or even just inside some {{ }} handlebars. You could send them as 3 separate templates with $[[0]] in each one, but I'm figuring that isn't the intent.

Makes sense