Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×
Create a free account
This post has been closed. You can still view previous posts, but you can't post any new replies.

[Suggestion] Auto-remove full group listings

A lot of the time I am looking in the Looking for Group page to, well, join a group. But I find way too many games with either 0 open slots or negative slots for games that are in the listings. I was thinking of having something that at least gives a warning to the GM/DM/etc. that they have enough or over enough players for their game, and that they should increase the needed player size or remove their game from the LFG listing.
I've suggested the same thing before. Too many GM's are lazy, and not properly de-listing their games from LFG. I would just prefer it automatically de-listing the game from LFG, and popping a message on the screen for the GM telling them so. If they really want more people, they should have listed the proper number of player's needed. I've also suggested auto-sorting the LFG page so that games with the most player's needed come first in the order. This would also let you easily ignore those towards the end of the list which show, "0 players needed" or negative numbers. Roll20 should do a better job of enforcing what gets listed. This should not just be an open classifieds section where they can let anybody post an ad. Qualifications should be met, or they should get de-listed until they are met. It's okay to be a bit strict, to make the LFG experience a good one. This is often the FIRST IMPRESSION to people new on Roll20, and it is also their strongest asset IMO. I wish they would spend more time making it, "the best," and not just, "adequate." Understand, though, that a lot of GMs get a strong response, and those experienced with online games know that it is more prone to high turnover than real-life games because players (and GM's too) sometimes don't take the time commitment seriously. So, as a GM, it is good to have a couple extra players just to watch the game, as they can easily, and quickly fill-in a spot because they know what is going on already, and obviously have the interest already there. But, yes, really the GM's need to do a better job of de-listing their games. Roll20 could help them (or enforce them) to do that, so that those who use LFG can have a better, more productive experience.
I wouldn't be too pleased with a mandatory delisting (as Quintus said, it's pretty common for people to flake out on you, so it's nice to have a few more applicants than you have slots to fill), but maybe a checked-by-default checkbox to automatically delist when full (and possibly relist when not full) could work. I'm definitely a fan of the suggestion to sort by number of open slots (especially if combined with filtering based on max/min open slots: I don't want to bother with listings with 99 open slots any more than I want to bother with listings with -3 open slots).