Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×
Create a free account

3.5 calling row id for repeating sections to simply button commands

August 27 (2 years ago)

Edited August 27 (2 years ago)

hello back yet again, i am trying to make an ability on the 3.5 sheet by Diana. i have the repeating section for the maneuvers and stances and i am trying to list them as buttons so that i don't have to have the character sheet open i can just call it in the chat window. the problem i am having is that i don't know how to call the individual maneuver or stance to do so. is what i am wanting even possible without the API?


here is what i have and i don't know what i am doing wrong

&{template:DnD35StdRoll} {{pcflag=true}} {{name=Maneuver Options}} {{[Sapphire Nightmare Blade](!
@{Batta|repeating_maneuvers15_$0_maneuvercast15}) 

[Punishing Stance](!
@{Batta|repeating_maneuvers15_$1_maneuvercast15})

[Bolstering Voice](!
@{Batta|repeating_maneuvers15_$2_maneuvercast15}) }}

September 25 (2 years ago)
GiGs
Pro
Sheet Author
API Scripter

This is very late and you may have figured it out already. You should be able to do that without the API, and the format looks correct but I dont know the attribute names on the sheet so can't comment on those. Do you get an error message, and if so, what is it?


Also are you calling an attribute or a button? Maybe they should have the number 64 replaced with 37, like

&{template:DnD35StdRoll} {{pcflag=true}} {{name=Maneuver 
Options}} {{[Sapphire Nightmare 
Blade](!
%{Batta|repeating_maneuvers15_$0_maneuvercast15}) [Punishing Stance](!
%{Batta|repeating_maneuvers15_$1_maneuvercast15}) [Bolstering Voice](!
%{Batta|repeating_maneuvers15_$2_maneuvercast15}) }}


September 26 (2 years ago)

okay i will give it a try to see if it works correctly. i had found a work around but it was definitely not what i wanted.