The Unofficial Elder Scrolls RPG

There is an issue with The Unofficial Elder Scrolls RPG sheet by Andrew Bowker and I'm unsure how to go about fixing it officially. It took me longer than I care to admit but i tracked down the GitHub page for it and it hasn't been updated in 3+ years. As for the issue, it's an integral one that effects the rolling system for skills. The system works in levels similar to older Elder Scrolls games where you're either Untrained in a skill, all the way up to Master proficiency. In the current ruleset, linked here:  Unofficial Elder Scrolls 3e  it states that an Untrained character should get a -10 to their rolls, but the sheet has it so that they gain a positive 20 instead. As follows, it has it so a master proficiency gives a -50 score, where the rules say it should be a positive 50. It's an extremely easy fix to make and I've already edited it on my end, but I'd like to make it so that nobody else has to have this issue too. Would I have to make my whole own new sheet, or is there any way I can update his old sheet for everyone?

Hi Epicmarkvan! If you have the skills to update a sheet, they are open for updating . It's generally considered good form to contact the sheet creator before doing anything like that, though. You can try contacting them under the user name Enrico . (user IDs can be found in the sheet's JSON file.)

keithcurtis said: Hi Epicmarkvan! If you have the skills to update a sheet, they are open for updating . It's generally considered good form to contact the sheet creator before doing anything like that, though. You can try contacting them under the user name Enrico . (user IDs can be found in the sheet's JSON file.) That's actually a different sheet. That sheet is a DnD 5e homebrew with Elder Scrolls. The one I'm talking about is a standalone game type called 'The Unofficial Elder Scrolls RPG. No t. It's a minor detail but it's two different games.  this is the page I'm looking at.

Thanks! I can see why you reported trouble finding the sheet. The number of them has passed github's listing cutoff. In that case, same things apply, but the author is Andrew B . Sorry for any confusion I might have caused.