Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×
Create a free account

I want more 1e Pathfinder and Starfinder

Like the title says. I like Roll20 and don't want to switch to Fantasy Grounds, but they make it more convenient to run 1st edition adventures from Paizo. It's ridiculous how little there is here, especially when Paizo makes it nearly impossible to simply extract art and maps from their PDFs to upload manually here.
Same! Playing through the Rise of the Runelords was great, but there's so many other great Adventure Paths. I'm planning on running Skull and Shackles within the next year, and that's going to be huge hassle importing maps and tokens.
1762090353

Edited 1762090368
Jacob R.
Pro
Translator
This issue comes up regularly. And every time it comes up, we get the wrong assertion that it's up to Paizo. Roll20 has a license from Paizo, so it's actually NOT up to Paizo.  According to Paizo's own marketing team: Roll20's license allows them to do pretty much anything we've published—determining what they should prioritize is largely up to them. (I expect if they hear the same requests from a lot of customers, they'll probably listen...) So it's Roll20 we need to "pressure". I also would like more PF1 content, and mimor improvements to the Roll20 sheet. So just let Roll20 know.
So it's Roll20 we need to "pressure". I also would like more PF1 content, and mimor improvements to the Roll20 sheet. So just let Roll20 know. So is the best way to do that to put up suggestion threads so people can upvote them? 
1762265703
Jacob R.
Pro
Translator
Yeah - that is one way to do it. I did that once, but very few voted unfortunately.
So who do we have to put pressure on directly?
Roll20... Tom