Looking for Oppinions on a new Pathfinder character I made.

Level: 10 Class: Monk <a href="http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=" rel="nofollow">http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=</a>... I figured it would be fun to try and it seems that paizo makes it completely possible.

As a GM, I don't see anything (feat, race feature, i dunno) there that would allow you to wield four weapons at once. Even if you argued that you have four basic attacks, it doesn't work as one with each leg. Since you didn't mark any negatives to your attack bonus as you would for trying to dual wield without the feat, I would have to say it isn't rules-legal. I'm not an expert, this is just a guess. You should play in the HERO system, since you can build pretty much what you want within the point limit. This would totally be possible there.

Steve I just have one point to bring up, Multi weapon fighting and Flurry of blows

My bad thats 2 things.

OH wait i see I forgot to put in the negatives because of flurry of blows as well.

I shall look this over a little more but nothing is stopping me from wielding 4 weapons in the setup i have with multi-weapon fighting.

MW is blocked by my company's firewall, but based on the comment above, I have a feeling you're going to be disappointed. To my mind, the only ability that legally allows you to wield more than two weapons is a native monster ability (see Demon, Marilith for an example). Additionally, I'm pretty sure, though I haven't found it yet in the SRD, that Paizo has a hard limit on the maximum number of attacks possible for a PC in PF.

Flurry of blows by level 20 as a monk you can take a full attack action to make 7 attacks in a row in one turn it doesn't specify that all of these attacks have to come from both arms so i figured it would be fun to play around and have a character that uses swords that are her legs as well all of the weapons in question are monk weapons which means i can use them for flurry of blows. <a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/multiweapon-fighting-combat" rel="nofollow">http://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/multiweapon-fighting-combat</a> Yes the feat multi weapon fighting states that you have to have 3 or more "hands" but if a GM is really gonna be hard pressed about something that small then i would drop it the character is meant to be a little more fun and unique compared to the usual cookie cutters everyone makes. Now I accept that yes I forgot to add in the negatives i would have gotten for flurry of blows which i will fix but by the rules with a extremely slight modification on multi weapon fighting I technically could fight like this.

Given that the intent of the ability seems to be pretty clear (it is spelled out in the last line, under "Special"), I can't imagine any GM would allow a non-Thri Kreen-type to take that feat. That isn't a "small" requirement by any stretch. The ability/feat exists to fill the gap for characters with more than two hands, if you have only two, then their is already an ability for you: Two-Weapon Fighting. Of course, we're talking about a monk here, so both of those feats are useless to them anyway. When flurrying, a monk's attacks are hard-set. You can use weapons as part of an attack (usually only monk-weapons, unless you have a feat), but they're not a separate attack, they're just part of the flurry. I can have two characters with the same exact stats and they'd be nothing alike. Building a good, unique character isn't about the build, but about the character him/herself.

SO ..... what your saying is its pointless to take the multi-weapon fighting feat anyways since i just can attack with all my weapons in a flurry as a monk innately.

This was a point of hot contention in D&D 3.5 (whether or not you could combine flurry with two-weapon fighting to get an unparalleled number of attacks with a monk). Paizo disambiguated this with the wording for the flurry of blows. <a href="http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/core-classes/monk" rel="nofollow">http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/core-classes/monk</a> Reading this you see that the ability functions as a modified two-weapon fighting feat. They are both like abilities and as such cannot be stacked any more than a monster with 4 hands using multi-weapon fighting and two-weapon fighting at the same time.

ok so im not sure here but i think flurry states that the attacks can be made with arms and legs when using the unarmed attacks therefore i would allow it if the weapon is realy fixxed on the limb (imagine a punchingdagger prosthesis)

It actually states with unarmed attacks OR with monk weapons what they are