No, but back when I first joined, I did tests of large numbers of rolls to seek for bias, and found none. A string of repeats is possible, but could be due to the way the roll macro is phrased, or just an unusual happenstance. It could also be an issue of confirmation bias (i.e. remembering things that irk you, but ignoring those that don't). If there were a real pattern of non-random rolling, believe me, it would be a big topic here. There are enough math wonks and coding gurus to raise a fit were this to be proved. Do you have a log of the rolls and the macros that produced them?