Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×
Create a free account

Shaped Sheet: Is it to automatically group macros by section?

1563226505

Edited 1563226577
EDIT: Oops, missed a word in the title.  It's suppose to read "Shaped Sheet: is it possible to automatically group macros by section?" I am using the latest Shaped Sheet (19.4.0) as well as the most recent Shaped Companion Script. Currently using either !shaped-abilities --whatever (or setting new character options under !shaped-config) lists the macros alphabetically then I go in for each one and append a number before each one to get the order more manageable. For instance (1.Adv, 2.Dis, 3.Multiattack, 4.ect). I was wondering since this is something I have been doing for each and every sheet if there was a way to sort them some way other than alphabetically, even by section would work so Actions were together, Legendary Actions together and so on. Admittedly it's not a huge deal especially for most creatures that don't have that many actions.  Just thought I would ask.
1563240283

Edited 1563240299
keithcurtis
Forum Champion
Marketplace Creator
API Scripter
You can, but it's a game-wide setting, not a per-character setting, and it treats Ability Token Actions (those on a character sheet) differently from Macro Token Actions (those on the Collections Tab). Go to your setting tab in game and deselect "Alphabetically sort Token Actions".  This will cause your Ability Token Actions to display in the order they appear in the characters' journals, followed by the Macro Token Actions in alphabetical order (these cannot be sorted any other way. With the option checked , All Token Actions display alphabetically, regardless of source.
Thanks again!  I was just looking in the wrong place, that will work nice. Not sure how I missed that one.