For my part, different *clothes* matter less than different *poses*, mostly recognizable as such because they wear the same clothes. :) You could conceivably make a set just for one PC at a time. Coming from Pathfinder 1e, medieval fantasy style, a list might be: Standing Sitting (as on a chair or at a bar) Straddling (for mounted use) Armed (room for multiple - sword & shield, pole arm, mace & shield, sword held 2-handed, crossbow, hand-crossbow, bow, etc.) Carrying torch Carrying lantern Unarmed Unarmored (this I would consider a "clothing" variant; and Pathfinder has a fairly long list of possible "Outfits" [nobles', explorers', artisans', commoners', etc.]) Prone Prone and Bloody Undead (Zombie) For NPC use, a couple of the clothing changes might be appropriate, but more useful to me would be a less-complete set of the PC ones listed - not as much need for multiple armed versions, for example, but still would be nice to have Sitting, Standing, Straddling, Carrying Torch, Carrying Lantern, etc. .. within reason. A NPC noble won't be carrying his/her own lights, but will have a servant NPC to do that. Hmm.. and guards. A variety of poses in the same armor, with different weapons would be useful to me (could be used to signify different ranks among them, for example). Back in the day, Ral Partha Miniatures used to do "3-stage characters". to represent the same PC with more elaborate armor, weapons, and other gear at Low, Medium, and High levels.