Hello Roll20. I am working on adding a bit of functional to the AD&D 2E Revised character sheet. Specifically I want to add Initiative buttons to the Potion, Dusts, and Scrolls section as it often happens that you need to use these items in combat, so an initiative button would be appropriate. So here I will present the current design, and a couple of different alternatives: Current Design As can be seen on the current design, it is currently not possible to assign a speed factor or add any of the items to the Turn Tracker via a Initiative button. New Design basis I would prefer to keep this section rather tight, so I am leaning against the previous design, and keeping each repeating element in two rows. I also felt that a heading was needed to better indicate what should go in each field. Specifically because both the Speed and Quantity input fields are number input. So my first draft is using a kind of dual heading, because I found a heading for each row of inputs to be excessive and did not match the rest of the design used in the sheet. My main problem arises when I add more rows to each. Should the heading be added everytime, or should there be no heading, or should it be some white space. I will show each of my proposed design, but I would also like if anyone had a better idea for the section all together. The only requirement is that the 3 original fields are kept. The underlying problem is that each element consists of 2 lines instead of 1. If each element was compressed into a single, then this would be solved by itself. Moving the elements to a single line, would increase the width, which is something I would try to avoid. New design 1: Old New Clearly indicates each item, but the extra headings seems redundant. New design 2: Old New This is closer to the original design, but without the headings, multiple elements seems to blend together, which makes it easy to lose track of which two rows are related to each other. This was not too much of a problem before as there was only one button, thus the button helped to indicate each element. New design 3: Old New 3A: Big whitespace 3B: Small whitespace This is the middle ground between the two. It works alright for a few items, but if the list gets too long the headers gets far away from each element, which again can create confusion. New design 4: Old New 4A: Big line 4B: Small line This uses a <hr> (horisontal line) with a small padding to separate each element from each other. This has the same problem as design 3, as many items can move the elements far away from the heading. However this looks a bit better than pure whitespace as the thin line shows more of a divide without taking too much focus. Your feedback Now Roll20 AD&D 2E users, I would like to hear your feedback on this. Which of these designs do you find best? Or do you have a better design all together? I am very open for input on this