Wedge said: Paulyhedron said: I think this needs a new reply. It is a plea after all. Society is ok and all, but there are a ton of us out here dying for Adventure Paths for meaningful character development and stories to be told. SF isn't a dead system. To the contrary; it's thriving. There's a tonne of people wanting to play, just not enough GMs to run it. Asides from the APs (which I desperately would like; Signal of Scream and Devastation Ark in particular), if they released the Armory and the Character Operations Manual; I'd buy them in a heart-beat. Now, about that Charactermancer they promised two years ago... For sure, would love any ap at this point. as well as Pact Worlds, Near Space, and COM. I don't really care if we get a charactermancer or not tbh since I am so used to building my own on here anyway. It seems as if 99% of games are online and granted not all are on this platform but using warhorn statistics on campaigns (mostly society and adventure league etc, it paints a different tale than what we see on roll20 as far as who is using the platform and for what) Pathfinder Society (1st edition) Pathfinder 1st Edition 113,434 49.9% D&D Adventurers League Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition 73,732 32.4% Starfinder Society Starfinder 17,779 7.8% Pathfinder Society (2nd edition) Pathfinder 2nd Edition 14,027 6.2% Pathfinder Adventure Card Society Pathfinder Adventure Card Game 3,499 1.5% There is your top 5. Now since Jan of last year I've been involved in society play both pf2 and Sf, since march of last year Ive taken characters in starfinder, 2 to level 8 and one to level 3, and in pf2 1 to level 9, 2 to level 6. That's a ton of gaming and its all been done on roll20, in fact all but one session on this platform. I do have several others at levels 4, 2, and a few 1's around playing with builds (including one who died in a pf2 quest, RIP Zelbert Fishbottom we hardly knew ye). There's an audience here is my point in this rant.