GiGs, Thanks for a
quick response! As a sheet author, I feel pretty confident in your knowledge about
it. Truthfully, I kind of figured the case would be that it’s not available. I was
hoping for more of a: it’s not available “ ye t”
scenario. One way or another, it wouldn't be me that figured it out, my
specialty is not writing code. I am not
interested in using third party software to do something that Roll20 would not
endorse on their own site. I agree that to have a discussion of that nature
here would be both ill-advised and in bad form. That being said, I have a
different view on what Roll20's business model is and how this idea would potentially
dovetail with it, offer increased convenience to the user and expand their
market share. As such, I believe the discussion could remain on topic for the
forums and, respectfully, I hope that you will agree and remain to continue it
a little longer. My apologies if this
is too much for the casual reader, but my persuasive speech professor would be
proud. My perception of
Roll20's model is: to profit by offering
a convenient and powerful online engine to support users of VTT games and to
promote the use of VTT . I see them doing this by staying informed of what
their public wants through the use of forums, enticing the user to purchase
worthwhile functionality for an increased fee through Plus and Pro memberships,
selling convenience in the form of Roll20-ready compendiums and adventures from
well know publishers that users desire, and by maintaining a functioning site
as evidenced by addressing user feedback and pushing out increasingly effective
upgrades. The items in the
marketplace are not strictly there for our information, it is a set of data for
the user’s convenience within the Roll20 engine. Roll20 pays for the ability to
have the content, and we purchase the content from them. They earn a profit on
the repackaging for their own framework. The user has other avenues that are
potentially more economic and functional to purchase the RP content should they
want it. Roll20 already offers the ability to include outside information at
the cost of labor intensive data entry. The idea of supporting
an external database for an increased fee to the Plus or Pro user doesn't hurt Roll20’s
business model from these perspectives, it helps it to grow. There are
similarities between this suggestion and the way Roll20 incorporates user
constructed API script privileges at the elite level. I hazard a guess that
they earn more from annual memberships then they do from the sale of
compendiums and adventures. This idea does not negate the sale of marketplace
items. If this is all true,
then the business model is based on the idea that users will always pay for convenience.
There will be existing users who are not interested in maintaining an external
library they will purchase convenience in the marketplace. There will be users
who upgrade from Base to Plus to Pro to use the added convenience of what I am
proposing.
It seems to me, based on
the previous response, a significant drawback to this is the security issue. I
am not versed enough to make that argument, but I imagine one of the
wonderfully smart people who already operate the site or speak on the forums
could help me out there?