Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×
Create a free account
This post has been closed. You can still view previous posts, but you can't post any new replies.

Keeping Legacy Lighting as an option choice. Don't remove it completely if possible.

Personally im not a fan of the new lighting, I have found legacy more adaptable to maps and to dnd modules roll20 has done. I know this prob a bit too late to appeal but perhaps others feel this way too? I have several games where I have 40+ maps that Im gonna have revert to the new lighting system that I don't even enjoy using... I understand its out with the old and in with the new but can it be fully optional that fully abolishing it at the very least? Is it that awkward to keep it existing? (Upvote if you agree folks)
Yup. This. Legacy is so much better. I have had two players peek around corners outside their movement, whole about to be engage in combat. One actually took a screen shot and posted it in a chat for the other players to see. With legacy The players can never skip ahead because they see what I show. I even started using legacy and updated and i think that prevents this problem but it seems like a lot of math and bandwidth for not much gain. Just use legacy lighting. 
Thanks for the suggestion! After 30 days, Suggestions and Ideas with fewer than 10 votes are closed and the votes are refunded to promote freshness. Your suggestion didn't build the right momentum this time, but feel free to submit it again! We find that the best suggestions describe the problem you are having, and the solution you want. You can learn more about the process of making suggestions on the Roll20 Wiki! More details can be found here .