Trying to pull from multiple rollable tables in a macro

Hello, I'm still kinda getting used to the Macros and what they are capable of.  I have rollable tables in my game for crits/fails that are currently broken up by severity based on levels of the characters.  For example I currently have [[1t[MeleeFail-(Lv.9-12)]]], [[1t[MeleeFail-(Lv.5-8)]]], and [[1t[-MeleeFail-(Lv.1-4)]]] as separate macros to roll these tables and pull back results.  What I would really like to do is have one macro that rolls all of these tables together and pulls one result back.  So that in the end its rolling levels 1-12 instead of 9-12, etc.  Thank you for any help that anyone can give with this.

The 'simple' way would be to just create another rollable table that has all of the level 1 - 12 fails listed together.  But outside of that, it won't be possible without an API script (Pro subscribers only). Since you have a Pro subscription, you could use The Aaron's RecursiveTables script to what you're looking for, or I'm sure timmaugh has a way to do it with his meta scripts. For the RecursiveTables script, I think you'd have to create one more rollable table (named MeleeFailLevels in my example) with three items: MeleeFailLevels (Lv.1-4) (Lv.5-8) (Lv.9-12) Then you'd use RecursiveTables to do something like this: !rt [[ 1t[MeleeFail-[[1t[MeleeFailLevels]]]] ]]

How would it choose which table to return a result from, or would it just randomly pick one from any of the tables?

Jarren K. said: Since you have a Pro subscription, you could use The Aaron's RecursiveTables script to what you're looking for, or I'm sure timmaugh has a way to do it with his meta scripts. Yep. I think the answer to Aaron's question (and the outcome desired -- is it a single event that needs resolving, or one event in a longer command line?) would tend to steer either toward RecursiveTable or Metascripts. I'm guessing a meta-solution would be somewhat similar to what I posted this morning, here . It would take Muler and ZeroFrame . I would probably set up a Mule with 3 variables... 1-4=[[1t[MeleeFail-(Lv.1-4)]]] 5-8=[[1t[MeleeFail-(Lv.5-8)]]] 9-12=[[1t[MeleeFail-(Lv.9-12)]]] Then any time I wanted to use the character's level in a roll against that table, I could use that in a "get" statement to resolve within those ranges: get.@{selected|Level}/get (the above would need the {& mule...} statement, including the name of the Mule that was storing those range variables) If Aaron is right and what you mean by rolling against any of the ranges is to have a random roll amongst all possible outcomes of the 3 tables (effectively a level 1 through 12 roll), then I would use a 1d12 as the variable to retrieve against that same Mule: get.[[1d12]].value/get The probabilities of that would be right if all of the 3 tables had the same number of returns available. If they were not of equal number, you could utilize a rollable table as the source for the variable instead of the 1d12, and then weight each line appropriately. For instance, if 1-4 had 30 entries, 5-8 had 40, and 9-12 had 50, you could have a table with weights of: VALUE | WEIGHT ------|--------- 4  |  30 8  |  40 12  |  50  Then use something like: get.[[1t[ThreeTableDistribution]]].value/get

If you're using the 5e by Roll20 sheet, one of the templates does a conditional display that would work (assuming what you're trying to do is basically roll from each table once, then pick which of the three results to keep with a 1d3).