Animus said: Twotricks said: What real quality ? Back in the day D&D was about buddies having fun game. What is it today, for you ? Amateur fantasy writer contest ? Competition for most quality player ? Thank you very much, I thought i am joining fun game, not competition. This might be your problem in not finding games. While I don't condone writing 500 word essays and stories about your character, I expect to pick people who will mesh with the group I play with, and the people I would like to consider a circle of friends. I don't pick people who I think are going to be jerks, anti-social, or generally rude. Perhaps you're coming off as abrasive, as people have pointed out here. Do GMs ever speak with you beyond the initial application process? I know that I prefer to do a voice interview after an application, maybe with another player or two to see what happens when they're not dealing with text. Sometimes, people come off as abrasive. Sometimes, they lose a personality entirely, and become willing to just say "Yes" to whatever is asked of them. Sometimes, people actually impress me, and I end up gaming with those people. I don't care about character concept. I'll look at it, consider it, but ultimately, I want to know that someone is flexible, and willing to change it - it's the least important part of an application. If you were to tell me that I should let you play because you thought games were for having fun, and fuck story, then I'd probably pass too? Telling a story is fun. The GM's fun is just as important as yours. And crafting a story, as a group, is far more fun than cracking some beers, and throwing some dice to kill some orcs. To me, at least. ;) Oh. All right ... No honestly this could not be the problem. Since my applications were always polite , friendly , meticulous to the fault in filling needed info. And nobody answered had "mini interview" and decided i am not fitting. People are simply not answering most of the submissions. Alas... I myself used to DM many games. And I know how much effort and prep goes into it. And honestly I only ever had problems with "over eager" players, the type of players you seem to praise here. They were hard to lead as DM, always questioning every move DM makes, and often jerks to other players for not being up to their "high" role-playing standards. Looking for, or preferring such players is in my opinion rookie mistake. But this is beyond the point. Since many of the words you posted here creep me out, to be honest. Voice interviews ? Oh my god... Now I am beginning to be glad i had no responses. Some of you are maybe taking it tad to far .... really not what I thought i am signing for. I will keep lookout for more relaxed games. Thanks for the info.