macro problems, things don't seem to parse right

I'm trying to build an Initiative macro for a housrule I run, and was trying to set it to work with 5e advantage aswell, however I came across an issue with grouped rolls  the macro is thus: &{template:5eDefault} {{title=Standardised Initiative}}{{deathsave=1}} {{roll=[[?{advantage?|standard, 4d4 |advantage, {4d4,4d4}kh1}} + (?{mod|1|-1})*?{dex mod|0|1|2|3|4|5|?{>5}} &{tracker}]]}} where {4d4,4d4}kh1} is supposed to be the grouped roll {4d4,4d4}kh1, however when that is put in it seems to parse it as {4d4}kh1} so I tried using the HTML for ,  and it returned as 4d4+4d4kh1  help please, anyone, the wiki has nothing

ok so I fixed the problem with the grouped roll with the following {4d4 , {4d4}}}kh1}}, however this then causes it to exit the macro and so none of the modifiers are added to the roll I'm at a loss

Have you checked out Advanced Usage for Roll Queries ? Regardless, you should be able to avoid using HTML entities by writing your macro like this: &{template:5eDefault} {{title=Standardised Initiative}} {{deathsave=1}} {{roll=[[ {4d4, ?{advantage?|standard, 0|advantage, 4d4} }kh1 + ?{mod|1|-1} * ?{dex mod|0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10} &{tracker} ]]}}

I have that's why I changed it?,  thank you for solving my issue though, I was starting to get quite confused. however I notice that now using your macro the standard setting doesn't work maybe something to do with using an M roll as a sub-roll in a query?

Here are the correct replacements in case they help: &{template:5eDefault} {{title=Standardised Initiative}}{{deathsave=1}} {{roll=[[?{advantage?|standard, 4d4 |advantage, {4d4,4d4}kh1} + (?{mod|1|-1})*?{dex mod|0|1|2|3|4|5|?{>5}} &{tracker}]]}} I removed an extra } from the macro, as well.

Chris D. said: however I notice that now using your macro the standard setting doesn't work maybe something to do with using an M roll as a sub-roll in a query? Right, try this: &{template:5eDefault} {{title=Standardised Initiative}} {{deathsave=1}} {{roll=[[ {4d4, ?{advantage?|standard, 0d0|advantage, 4d4} }kh1 + ?{mod|1|-1} * ?{dex mod|0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10} &{tracker} ]]}}

yes, that was how I corrected it