Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×

Godbound Roll Macro Assistance

Hey everyone, I know the Godbound sheet is a little busted at the moment so I took the code, fixed it up, and am using it as a custom sheet in my own campaign. The to-hit roll makes absolutely no sense to me. I can't find much documentation about the > function, but I'm pretty sure it should be telling me whether or not someone got over 20. This is the formula: {{attack=[[1d20 + (@{weapon_base_ab}) + (@{weapon_ab}) + (@{weapon_attribute}) + ?{Attack Modifier|0} + (?{Target AC|9})>20]]}} The result doesn't tell me a number of successes, just a number that can range from 2 to 18 or so. And I have no idea what the number is in relation to. I feel like I am fundamentally misunderstanding what should be coming out of the > function by for the life of me I can't figure it out.
(?{Target AC|9})>20 This is syntactically meaningless. It's possible that the sheet's author meant to create a Grouped Roll , but neglected to add the necessary braces to do so: {{attack=[[ { 1d20 + (@{weapon_base_ab}) + (@{weapon_ab}) + (@{weapon_attribute}) + ?{Attack Modifier|0} + (?{Target AC|9}) } >20]]}}
Silvyre said: (?{Target AC|9})>20 This is syntactically meaningless. It's possible that the sheet's author meant to create a Grouped Roll , but neglected to add the necessary braces to do so: {{attack=[[ { 1d20 + (@{weapon_base_ab}) + (@{weapon_ab}) + (@{weapon_attribute}) + ?{Attack Modifier|0} + (?{Target AC|9}) } >20]]}} I had tried with those braces before, and it didn't work.  Turns out that the reason it didn't work was because it didn't like that there was no value in the weapon attack bonus field, so it would never roll. Looks like my problem is solved! Thank you so much. Also is there a way to get some of these changes I have looked at for incorporation into the official sheet? I don't think the person who made it is fixing any issues with it anymore.
Jordan D. said: Looks like my problem is solved! Thank you so much. Also is there a way to get some of these changes I have looked at for incorporation into the official sheet? I don't think the person who made it is fixing any issues with it anymore. Great! If you're interested in contributing a change to the sheet, I recommend first checking out the Github repository and Beginner's Guide to GitHub .