Brian said: G V. said: Not completely accurate, but DXWarlock is correct in that Roll20 has three different column classes pre-built: sheet-col, sheet-2cols, and sheet-3cols. However, you can have a TON of columns using just those three classes. Here are some things to remember: The built-in classes are sheet-col, sheet-2colrow, and sheet-3colrow. My bad...I wasn't at home and was trying to do it from memory, but I rarely use sheet-2colrow and sheet-3colrow. Brian said: G V. said: It has also been my experience that if you don't define a custom <div> class in the CSS that it takes on the properties of a <div> with the class of "sheet-col". I could be wrong, but that's been my experience as I build things. No. <div> elements have default style properties, and possibly some properties specified in base.css, but a <div> without a class is not the same as a sheet-col div. In particular, div by default has display: block (it takes up the full width of its parent), while sheet-col (which is inside a sheet-2colrow or sheet-3colrow) has display: inline-block. Again, my bad. :) What I meant was that in my character sheets, when I use <div> and don't give it a class, but I do define a width, I seem to be able to stack them next to each other, just like using sheet-col. That's why I assumed they took on that same basic formatting. Grim, you are definitely better off listening to Brian than anything I say; he has answered my questions more times than I can count. And, like Coal Powered Puppet said of himself in another thread, my style is more of a "headbutt-it-into-submission", often times not understanding why something is working, only that it does.