Roll20 uses cookies to improve your experience on our site. Cookies enable you to enjoy certain features, social sharing functionality, and tailor message and display ads to your interests on our site and others. They also help us understand how our site is being used. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. Update your cookie preferences .
×

Signing up for games and voting on missions

1471773456

Edited 1471773522
Stephen D
Elite
Marketplace Creator
I have noticed that the newcomers to Maladon have not picked up on some of the informal good habits surrounding signing up for games and so I am putting them out as formal rules to help people avoid TPKs and other mission disasters. From now the sign up process should happen as follows: 1) GM announces a game and a sign up period. This sign up period should close two days (48 hours) before the game starts. All passes must be played BEFORE sign up closes. 2) Once the sign up period has closed, one of the players or the GM draws up an informal tier list (or asks a CoGm to help them do so). 3) The first 8 players on the Tier list get to vote on a mission as soon as sign up has closed; unless someone has played a pass that allows them to dictate the mission. This is because the tier list may change and players in positions 7 and 8 are likely to play because of movement in the tier list. 4) Once the first 8 have voted, mission is chosen and it cannot be changed; this also acts as an incentive to sign up for games early; otherwise you won't get a vote. Players now get to vote how many to bring on a mission; because dangerous missions might require bigger parties. 5) Players can withdraw from missions they feel are too dangerous for their characters up to 24 hr before the mission if they feel the party is too small etc 6) If the GM does not have enough players for any reason, due to dropouts etc, he/she is entitled and encouraged to gather players from those around chat before the session. This is preferable to cancelling a session. 7) If, in game, it becomes obvious that a mission is too dangerous for the party, it is completely acceptable (and indeed encouraged) for a party to change mission to 'light exploring' and GMs should be ready for this with some small locations and encounter tables in a safer area. Let's discuss these rules; thoughts?
I find all of them fine with a bit of leeway. 48h signup + 24hr  means games have to be announced at least 3 days before so that not a mission gets chosen and there is no time for someone to say they withdraw from the list.  4: worst case that means 7 and 8 vote for a mission and don't make it into the game and the 6 that didn't vote for it have to play it ;)
I think players should be encouraged to include multiple quests in their vote rather than just their top pick. For example if people vote; A: 3 B: 2 C: 4 D: 4 E: 7 F: 5 G: 1 H: 8 We get mission 4 even if most of the party might really not like that one. If instead we have; A: 3, 2, 7 B: 2, 1, 4 C: 4, 2, 6 D: 4, 5, 8 E: 7, 3, 2 F: 5, 2, 8 G: 1, 4, 2 H: 8, 6, 2 Then we get mission 2 because it appears 7 times whereas mission 4 only appeared 4 times. It's a little bit more work to tally up but I think would make sure the selection is more representative of what players actually want to do.
Not directly for players signing up but could help us do so. When a game gets posted, could we have the Maladon dates included so we are able to plan around character training and availability?
1471793392

Edited 1471793415
I think it might be wise to stop asking players to post their tier when they signup for a game. I don't even know that GMs look at what players have posted considering we have the tier list.  Also, in the Passes rules it says that Silver passes must be played BEFORE a session. This probably should be mentioned in point 1. 
With No.5, Is the mission going to be decided 24Hr prior to the session? From what I've seen we mostly decide just before the session. Also If a player withdraws, does their job vote remain accounted or does the next player in line get to cast their vote?
1471808322

Edited 1471810290
i would say the 2nd i.e. next player votes, and 24h before session gives GMs to prep
If the job is decided 24h prior ,that leaves no window for someone to back out if the job is found to be too difficult for their characters.
well the decision is end of sign up as the proposal, so as long as GMs set the signup in a way that it closes more than 24h before the session