GM rating system...

Ok, let's face it... GM'ing is a skill that requires a bit of talent, a lot of planning, and takes time to learn. A lot of us really want to play a decent game, but after the last 5 M&M games I've been in have crashed and burned within 3 sessions it got me thinking... We should be able to rate our GMs... Like an Amazon review... If you've made it into a game you should give them a GM rating from 1-5 stars with 3 being average. If a guy starts 5 games and doesn't get beyond 1 session their players should be able to rate and give a review. Then, if they are listed as a GM fir a game their GM stars should be displayed. Simple as that. We need to start cracking down on GMs who simply aren't suited, or unfit, for running ju NG games.

Allowing people to ascribe a rating to other people is not something The Powers That Be really want on Roll20, even though I understand why it would be useful to weed out toxicity in peer-driven games like tabletop.&nbsp; This type of feature can and has been very easily abused before. On toxic users though, that is why our dev and mod team is here. They&nbsp; absolutely want to weed out toxic users and abusive users but rating is not the way to do that. Reporting toxic behavior is. Please report any users that violate the code of conduct and if you don't see a report button on the relevant interaction, please email the Devs at <a href="mailto:team@roll20.net" rel="nofollow">team@roll20.net</a>