Thats a good question. Table rolls dont have the quantum roll symbol, but that might just be a user-interface oversight. Whether the quantumroll system is used or not, you cant really go off personal feeling to tell if the rolls are random enough. You need to sample thousands of rolls, and check the distribution. For instance, i just created a d2, and made 1000 rolls (/roll 1000t[d2]) three times, and got 1506, 1531, and 1497, with an expected value of 1500. Thats very minor variation, easily accountable by random variation. If your table has more than two entries, its a lot harder to collate the results and analyze them, especially it its not producing numerical results. It would need to be an API script (Pro) to organise the output in a format you could analyze. But I feel comfortable saying it's probably as close to random as they can make it. Remember that with random rolls, you will get long stretches of low rolls, and long stretches of high rolls, with no pattern between them. It'll average out over the very long term. Which is why you need to do thousands of rolls to test it.