Adding Dices to Roll

Is there a way to actually add dices to a certain dice pool in a macro without using the API? For example, I need to roll an amount of dice equals to the sum of two different numbers that can be inputted by the player. Something like this:  /em attacks! No. of Successes: [[ ?{Atribute1|0}+?{Atribute2|1}d?{Die Size|1d8,8|1d10,10|1d12,12}+?{Modifier|0}s>?{Difficulty|8}]] The idea is that you can input both Atribute1 and Atribute2, they'll be added to reach a number of dices that will be rolled according with the die size selected and added to a modifier. Each of those dices will be compared to the difficulty set and the resulting roll in the chat will show how many dices plus modifiers reached the difficulty. I actually was able to do this roll using two macros, one for the size of the dice pool, another for the rest of  the roll, like this: #dicepool macro: [[?{Atribute1|0}+?{Atribute2|1}]] /em attacks! No. of Successes: [[ [[ #dicepool ]]d?{Die Size|1d8,8|1d10,10|1d12,12}+?{Modifier|0}s>?{Difficulty|8}]] The only thing is that, while using this method does makes the rolls the way I want, the resulting chat message would show the total of all dices rolled, not the amount of successes reached between each dice. I know it's a confusing concept, and I'm sorry if I couldn't be more eloquent, as English isn't my first language. Thanks for your time.

[[ (?{1st Attribute|1} + ?{2nd Attribute|1})d?{Die|1d8,8|1d10,10|1d12,12} + ?{Modifier|0}s>?{Difficulty|8} ]]

Thanks for the reply, HoneyBadger! Well, using parenthesis, I can reach the same results of adding a second macro: While it rolls just as I want it to, it still overrides the conditional success. For example, if I roll a fixed amount of dice, it'd show like this: No. of Successes: 1 [Rolling {2d8s+2}>8={(4+6)+2}] If I use the sampled code to do the same roll, it shows like this: No. of Successes: 12 [Rolling {(1+1)d8s+2}>8={(4+6)+2}] And I'd want the first example with the adding operation before rolling. As you can see, the second kind of macro adds the modifier only once, but I don't think it actually matters to the success testing, as the first one works as expected (adding 2 to 6 before comparing, in this case).

There is no means in the dice engine to add a modifier to each of a variable number of dice, and then compare each of those totals to a difficulty.

Ah, I see what I did wrong now. Number of Successes: [[{(1+1)d6+0}>1]] Just replace the numbers with your roll queries.

Brian said: There is no means in the dice engine to add a modifier to each of a variable number of dice, and then compare each of those totals to a difficulty. It sure looks like this one is working that way.

Thanks for both answers! HoneyBadger, now it worked perfectly! Thanks for the help, I wasn't aware of the use of parenthesis for this kind of operations and, with this structure you've written, it worked as a charm. Brian, as far as my testing goes, this code actually does what I meant to do! This was the rolls resulted from the updated code: No. of Successes: 1 [ Rolling {(2+1)d8s+2}>8 = {(1+5+7)+2} ] No. of Successes: 4 [ Rolling {(3+1)d8s+2}>8 = {(6+7+7+8)+2} ] As you can see, it adds +2 to each rolled dice and for those that reach 8, it marks a success. The only success in the first roll was 7+2=9, while each dice in the second roll, plus 2, reaches 8. Just as I wanted to. Thanks for your help and have a nice day!

You could also do d8scf0cs100 to prevent the green, red, and blue highlight around the inline rolls.