So, as far as i can tell, everything is layed out correctly for this particular macro, and it should be outputting, except it isn't, at all. @{selected|token_name}&{template:shadowrun}{{name=@{selected|token_name}}}{{roll_name=?{Ability|Body, Body|Agility, Agility|Reaction, Reaction|Strength, Strength|Charisma, Charisma|Intuition, Intuition|Logic, Logic|Willpower, Willpower|Magic, Magic}}}{{val1=[[@{selected|token_name}?{Ability|Body, Body|Agility, Agility|Reaction, Reaction|Strength, Strength|Charisma, Charisma|Intuition, Intuition|Logic, Logic|Willpower, Willpower|Magic, Magic}]]}} {{val1_num=[[@{selected|token_name}?{Ability|Body, bod_total|Agility, agi_total|Reaction, rea_total|Strength, str_total|Charisma, cha_total|Intuition, int_total|Logic, log_total|Willpower, wil_total|Magic, mag_total}]]}}{{mod_num=[[{?Situational Modifiers|0}]]}}{{edge=@{selected|token_name|edgeroll}}}{{edge_num=[[@{selected|token_name|edg_total}]]}}{{wounds_num=[[?{Apply Wounds|Yes, 1|No, 0}*(@{selected|token_name|wound_total})]]}}{{result=[[(@{selected|token_name|?{Ability|Body, bod_total|Agility, agi_total|Reaction, rea_total|Strength, str_total|Charisma, cha_total|Intuition, int_total|Logic, log_total|Willpower, wil_total|Magic, mag_total}}+?{Situational Modifiers}-?{Apply Wounds}*[[@{selected|token_name|wound_total}]]+[[@{selected|token_name|edgn}*@{selected|token_name|edg_total}]])@{selected|token_name|standardroll}@{selected|token_name|edgeroll}]]} Yes, this is very large, and kind of cumbersome, as you can probably see though i am trying to get around a couple of query issues. 1: Using the same query names, to get the Roll name, the attribute names, and the values. 2: Be usable for any PC token, by using the selected|token_name 3: Output on the shadowrun template Most of this was taken from a standard roll, It asks for the query correctly, and works if i remove the result The issue is somewhere in the bolded section, that is as far as i have been able to narrow it down. I would also really like to be able to make that output the number of failures alongside the success, which the standardroll doesn't do Any suggestions will be tested and apprecieated