To me, it would seem like ~C ~J ~L and ~R are detected as the formatting tool to respectively Center, Justify, align Left and align Right.
If that is the case and those are formatting options, that's fine, but is there a way to circumvent that so I can use my player's Character name? The only reason I ask is my players seem to be having trouble getting a handle on the way the systems function and having them be required to click their character token is an extra step that may cause problems. Yes I'm aware that is a minor thing but I just want to make things easier for my players if I can.Nicolas B. said:
To me, it would seem like ~C ~J ~L and ~R are detected as the formatting tool to respectively Center, Justify, align Left and align Right.
Athena said:
Is there anyway to get the PowerCards template to appear first in the chat? I am trying to combine the really cool in-chat token appearance functionality with the 5e Shaped Sheets rolling template, but the Shaped Sheets template always shows up first. I've tried both using macro calls like so
%{selected|Power}
%{selected|Attack-Lightbringer}
and normal functionality like so
!power {{
--tokenid|@{selected|token_id}
--target_list|@{target|token_id}
--emote|@{selected|character_name} attacks
}}
%{-LAog7cWrDX5IilugjHc|repeating_offense_-lb-vrgmtgtc1bai1w5b_roll}
These are in the abilities section of the default character options.
Russell S. said:
If that is the case and those are formatting options, that's fine, but is there a way to circumvent that so I can use my player's Character name? The only reason I ask is my players seem to be having trouble getting a handle on the way the systems function and having them be required to click their character token is an extra step that may cause problems. Yes I'm aware that is a minor thing but I just want to make things easier for my players if I can.Nicolas B. said:
To me, it would seem like ~C ~J ~L and ~R are detected as the formatting tool to respectively Center, Justify, align Left and align Right.
You might be able to do:Broody said:
Hi, (already sorry for my bad english)
i've recently upgrade to PRO and i wanna try some API. i'll use this powercard but i have some truble.
!power {{
--name|Execution
--leftsub|@{target|token_name}
--Attack:|[[ [$Atk] 1D21CS>19+13+@{selected|Atk}]] vs @{target|CA} CA
--?? $Atk.base == 1 OR $Atk <= @{target|CA} ?? !Missed|**You missed!**
--?? $Atk.base == 1 OR $Atk >= @{target|CA} AND $Atk.base <= 18 ?? soundfx1|_play|Sword
--?? $Atk >= @{target|CA} AND $Atk.base <= 18 ?? Hit:|[[ [$Dmg] 2D8+ 1D10 +17+@{selected|Deg}+(10*?{Rage|0})]] damage
--?? $Atk >= @{target|CA} AND $Atk.base <= 18 ?? alterbar1|_target|@{target|token_id} _bar|1 _amount|-[^Dmg]
--?? $Atk.base >= 19 ?? Critical Hit:|[[ [$CritDmg] 4D8+2D10+34+(2*@{selected|Deg})+(20*?{Rage|0})]] damage
--?? $Atk.base >= 19 ?? alterbar12|_target|@{target|token_id} _bar|1 _amount|-[^CritDmg]
}}
/fx splatter-blood @{target|token_id} @{selected|token_id}
!attrib Rage|[[@{selected|Rage}-(?{Rage|0})]] -- @{selected|token_id}
this is work some good but "(20*?{Rage|0})" (and other x*y) doesn't work and not calculate:/
There is a otehr way than my option "+?{Rage|0}+?{Rage|0}+?{Rage|0}+?{Rage|0}+?{Rage|0}+?{Rage|0}...."
i have a second question but dunno if i'm at good place, maybe you can help me ;)
i wanna change attribut for all char but actually i'll only can do with @{target}
!attrib Atk|[[@{selected|Atk}+6]] -- @{selected|token_id}
!attrib Atk|[[@{Ahlu|Atk}+6]] -- @{target|Ahlu|token_id}
!attrib Atk|[[@{Axis|Atk}+6]] -- @{target|Axis|token_id}
!attrib Atk|[[@{Tasheki|Atk}+6]] -- @{target|Tasheki|token_id}
!attrib Atk|[[@{Victoria|Atk}+6]] -- @{target|Victoria|token_id}
!attrib Atk|[[@{Dakeyras|Atk}+6]] -- @{target|Dakeyras|token_id}
i'll need to click on all my char in right way and it's busy ^^
i'll try to match a token_id or chararcter_id but never find a good way :(
Help me plizzz
(sorry again for my english, et si vous voulez/pouvez répondre en français ça m'arrange un peu ^^)
Thx for this stuff !
Black.k.9 said:
So I was told to ask around in here for help on a script. What I want to do is simply use the success function in a roll template or power card for roll20 to calculate whether or not an attack hits, or crits and display different information concisely depending on the result.
Basically, it's a d100 system, so if 1d100>45 results in a failure or "0" then it should show up as this in the chat:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> but misses <target>!"
If the attack is a success, it should also check for a crit with a second roll (based off of a different success variable). If it was a successful hit, but not a crit it should show up as:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> and deals <x> damage to <target>!"
And finally if the attack was a hit, and was a crit (both values resulting in 1) then it should show up as this:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> and crits for <x> damage to <target>!"
Kurt J. said:
Black.k.9 said:
So I was told to ask around in here for help on a script. What I want to do is simply use the success function in a roll template or power card for roll20 to calculate whether or not an attack hits, or crits and display different information concisely depending on the result.
Basically, it's a d100 system, so if 1d100>45 results in a failure or "0" then it should show up as this in the chat:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> but misses <target>!"
If the attack is a success, it should also check for a crit with a second roll (based off of a different success variable). If it was a successful hit, but not a crit it should show up as:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> and deals <x> damage to <target>!"
And finally if the attack was a hit, and was a crit (both values resulting in 1) then it should show up as this:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> and crits for <x> damage to <target>!"
Not knowing the details of what you are using (system-wise), the following PowerCard will do what you are are describing. The "--Rolls" line is for informational purposes, since all of the rolls are made silently. This assumes 1d100 to hit, 45 or higher needed, 1d100 for crit, 70 or higher for that, and 1d10 for normal damage or 2d10 for crit damage:
!power {{
--name|@{selected|character_name} attacks...
--hroll|[[ [$Atk] 1d100 ]] [[ [$Crit] 1d100 ]] [[ [$Dmg] 1d10 ]] [[ [$CDmg] 1d10 + 1d10 ]]
--Rolls|FYI, rolls were Atk: [^Atk], Crit: [^Crit], Dmg: [^Dmg], CDmg: [^CDmg]
--?? $Atk < 45 ?? Miss|@{selected|character_name} attacks @{target|character_name} but misses!
--?? $Atk > 45 AND $Crit < 70 ?? Hit|@{selected|character_name} attacks @{target|character_name} and hits for [^Dmg] damage.
--?? $Atk > 45 AND $Crit >= 70 ?? Critical|@{selected|character_name} attacks @{target|character_name} and crits for [^CDmg] damage.
}}
Kurt J. said:
Black.k.9 said:
So I was told to ask around in here for help on a script. What I want to do is simply use the success function in a roll template or power card for roll20 to calculate whether or not an attack hits, or crits and display different information concisely depending on the result.
Basically, it's a d100 system, so if 1d100>45 results in a failure or "0" then it should show up as this in the chat:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> but misses <target>!"
If the attack is a success, it should also check for a crit with a second roll (based off of a different success variable). If it was a successful hit, but not a crit it should show up as:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> and deals <x> damage to <target>!"
And finally if the attack was a hit, and was a crit (both values resulting in 1) then it should show up as this:
"<attacker> attacks with <weapon> and crits for <x> damage to <target>!"
Not knowing the details of what you are using (system-wise), the following PowerCard will do what you are are describing. The "--Rolls" line is for informational purposes, since all of the rolls are made silently. This assumes 1d100 to hit, 45 or higher needed, 1d100 for crit, 70 or higher for that, and 1d10 for normal damage or 2d10 for crit damage:
!power {{
--name|@{selected|character_name} attacks...
--hroll|[[ [$Atk] 1d100 ]] [[ [$Crit] 1d100 ]] [[ [$Dmg] 1d10 ]] [[ [$CDmg] 1d10 + 1d10 ]]
--Rolls|FYI, rolls were Atk: [^Atk], Crit: [^Crit], Dmg: [^Dmg], CDmg: [^CDmg]
--?? $Atk < 45 ?? Miss|@{selected|character_name} attacks @{target|character_name} but misses!
--?? $Atk > 45 AND $Crit < 70 ?? Hit|@{selected|character_name} attacks @{target|character_name} and hits for [^Dmg] damage.
--?? $Atk > 45 AND $Crit >= 70 ?? Critical|@{selected|character_name} attacks @{target|character_name} and crits for [^CDmg] damage.
}}
--?? [[@{target|is_npc}]] == 1 AND [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] >= [[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] ?? NPC|[[ [$Chk] 1d20 + [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] ]] Dexterity Check ([[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] DEX Mod) ([^Chk])
!power {{
--name|Grapple
--format|contest
--leftsub|Ability Check
--rightsub|Contest
--target_list|@{target|token_id}
--charid|@{selected|character_id}
--emote|@{selected|character_name} vs @{target|token_name}
--Attack|[[ [$Atk] ?{Attack Type|Standard, 1d20|Advantage, 2d20kh1|Disadvantage, 2d20kl1} + [[@{selected|athletics}]] [Tot Athletics Bonuses] ]] Athletics Check
--?? [[@{target|athletics}]] > [[@{target|acrobatics}]] ?? PC|[[ [$Chk] 1d20 + [[@{target|athletics}]] ]] Athletics Check ([[@{target|athletics}]] Total Athletics Bonuses)
--?? [[@{target|acrobatics}]] >= [[@{target|athletics}]] ?? PC|[[ [$Chk] 1d20 + [[@{target|acrobatics}]] ]] Acrobatics Check ([[@{target|acrobatics}]] Total Acrobatics Bonuses)
--?? [[@{target|is_npc}]] == 1 AND [[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] > [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] ?? NPC|[[ [$Chk] 1d20 + [[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] ]] Strength Check ([[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] STR Mod)
--?? [[@{target|is_npc}]] == 1 AND [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] >= [[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] ?? NPC|[[ [$Chk] 1d20 + [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] ]] Dexterity Check ([[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] DEX Mod) ([^Chk])
--Result|@{selected|character_name} ([^Atk]) vs @{target|token_name} ([^Chk])
--?? $Atk >= $Chk ?? Success|@{target|token_name} is now grappled!
--?? $Atk < $Chk ?? Fail|@{target|token_name} was able to evade your grasp!
}}
Black.k.9 said:
Another question I have is... how do I implement the API, or is it already implemented?
Kurt J. said:
There are a couple of things going on here:
First, the two conditional lines with PC| and the two with NPC| need to use the Same Name tag (PC*1, PC*2, NPC*1, and NPC*2). Duplicating tag names will cause lots of havoc with the way PowerCards evaluates the card.
Second, a conditional only determines if the line is displayed or not. The line is still evaluated even if the conditional will end up hiding the line. This means that the last line that is evaluated will set the Roll ID if more than one line set it. Combine this with the internal confusion that will result from duplicated tag names and things will get weird fast.
Finally, the whole card is evaluated before the output is created, so you could actually display the value of [^Chk] as the first line of the card, even though it isn't set until later down in the card (and then it is set 4 times - again not accounting for the duplicate tag confusion.)
What you could do is make all of the possible rolls and store them in different RollIDs and then use conditionals to only output the relevant roll (ie, roll $ChkPCStr, $ChkPCDex, $ChkNPCStr, and $ChkNPCDex and then use conditionals to decide which one to show.) That will make the conditionals a bit more complicated, but it should allow you to do what you want to do.
Ben L. said:
Kurt J. said:
There are a couple of things going on here:
First, the two conditional lines with PC| and the two with NPC| need to use the Same Name tag (PC*1, PC*2, NPC*1, and NPC*2). Duplicating tag names will cause lots of havoc with the way PowerCards evaluates the card.
Second, a conditional only determines if the line is displayed or not. The line is still evaluated even if the conditional will end up hiding the line. This means that the last line that is evaluated will set the Roll ID if more than one line set it. Combine this with the internal confusion that will result from duplicated tag names and things will get weird fast.
Finally, the whole card is evaluated before the output is created, so you could actually display the value of [^Chk] as the first line of the card, even though it isn't set until later down in the card (and then it is set 4 times - again not accounting for the duplicate tag confusion.)
What you could do is make all of the possible rolls and store them in different RollIDs and then use conditionals to only output the relevant roll (ie, roll $ChkPCStr, $ChkPCDex, $ChkNPCStr, and $ChkNPCDex and then use conditionals to decide which one to show.) That will make the conditionals a bit more complicated, but it should allow you to do what you want to do.
I changed the PC and NPC lines to be unique now, but it had no effect on the result as I would expect.
As far as the rest... I can't find the reference in the forums, but it was my understanding that if a conditional evaluates false then the entire line is skipped. Meaning that any rolls or output for that line are not processed. However, that doesn't even matter since the last conditional line for setting my $Chk variable is the one that evaluates true. No matter how many times $Chk is set previously, that last line will be the one setting it last and that's the value that will be used. Also, it is obvious that the value set the previous time (in the PC line above) doesn't match the later value either. You can see from my example that this is the case, yet the $Chk variable is still showing a different value than when it is set on either line. This is a random, magical value that literally comes out of nowhere!
I will give the more complicated version you suggest a go and see what happens.
!power {{
--name|Grapple
--format|contest
--leftsub|Ability Check
--rightsub|Contest
--target_list|@{target|token_id}
--charid|@{selected|character_id}
--emote|@{selected|character_name} vs @{target|token_name}
--Attack|[[ [$Atk] ?{Attack Type|Standard, 1d20|Advantage, 2d20kh1|Disadvantage, 2d20kl1} + [[@{selected|athletics}]] [Tot Athletics Bonuses] ]] Athletics Check
--?? [[@{target|athletics}]] > [[@{target|acrobatics}]] ?? PC1|[[ [$ChkPCAth] 0d0 + [[@{target|athletics}]] ]] Athletics (ChkPCAth [^ChkPCAth] mod)
--?? [[@{target|acrobatics}]] >= [[@{target|athletics}]] ?? PC2|[[ [$ChkPCAcr] 0d0 + [[@{target|acrobatics}]] ]] Acrobatics (ChkPCAcr [^ChkPCAcr] mod)
--?? [[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] > [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] ?? NPC1|[[ [$ChkNPCStr] 0d0 + [[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] ]] Strength (ChkNPCStr [^ChkNPCStr] mod)
--?? [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] >= [[@{target|npc_strength_save_mod}]] ?? NPC2|[[ [$ChkNPCDex] 0d0 + [[@{target|npc_dexterity_save_mod}]] ]] Dexterity (ChkNPCDex [^ChkNPCDex] mod)
--SetVar1|[[ [$ChkPC] 0d0 + $ChkPCAth ]] Using PC Athletics (ChkPCAth [^ChkPCAth]) (ChkPC [^ChkPC])
--?? $ChkPCAcr > $ChkPCAth ?? SetVar2|[[ [$ChkPC] 0d0 + $ChkPCAcr ]] Using PC Acrobatics (ChkPCAcr [^ChkPCAcr]) (ChkPC [^ChkPC])
--SetVar3|[[ [$ChkNPC] 0d0 + $ChkNPCStr ]] Using NPC Strength mod (ChkNPCStr [^ChkNPCStr]) (ChkNPC [^ChkNPC])
--?? $ChkNPCDex > $ChkNPCStr ?? SetVar4|[[ [$ChkNPC] 0d0 + $ChkNPCDex ]] Using NPC Dexterity (ChkNPCDex [^ChkNPCDex]) (ChkNPC [^ChkNPC])
--SetVar5|[[ [$Chk] 1d20 + $ChkPC ]] Set result to PC roll value (Chk [^Chk]) (ChkPC[^ChkPC])
--?? [[@{target|is_npc}]] == 1 ?? SetVar6|[[ [$Chk] 1d20 + $ChkNPC ]] Set result to NPC roll value (Chk [^Chk]) (ChkNPC [^ChkNPC])
--Result|@{selected|character_name} (Atk [^Atk]) vs @{target|token_name} (Chk [^Chk])
--?? $Atk >= $Chk ?? Success|@{target|token_name} is now grappled!
--?? $Atk < $Chk ?? Fail|@{target|token_name} was able to evade your grasp!
}} 
Ben L. said:
So, in trying to circumvent the previous problem I have discovered another. I can't believe I'm the first one to try and use these variables in this way, so where is the solution to this? I'm completely stumped!
Kurt J. said:
Ben L. said:
So, in trying to circumvent the previous problem I have discovered another. I can't believe I'm the first one to try and use these variables in this way, so where is the solution to this? I'm completely stumped!
It is important to keep in mind that Roll IDs are NOT variables... When a card is processed, each tag's rolls are computed and stored in Roll IDs early on in the process before much else happens, and existing RollIDs in a roll are not parsed (they will just be treated as extraneous text).
Roll IDs only have two uses: comparing in conditionals and outputting their values when the card is displayed. You can't include a Roll ID as a value in another roll because they aren't defined at the point the rolls are calculated. (I know this is something people are interested in being able to do, but I would need to do a lot of code examination and testing before I'd be comfortable saying that it will work properly).
When I say make all of the rolls ahead of time, I mean leave off all of the conditionals for the rolls... You can drop a $ in front of the tags after you've got it working to hide the line completely. Roll as if it is a PC using Strength and store it, then as a PC using Dex and store that, etc. You end up with four Roll IDs that you can then check conditionals against, so:
IF target is a PC AND target str > target dex AND AttackRoll >= ChkPCStr show success message
IF target is a PC AND target str > target dex AND AttackRoll < ChkPCStr show failure message
IF target is a PC AND target str < target dex AND AttackRoll >= ChkPCDex show success message
IF target is a PC AND target str < target dex AND AttackRoll < ChkPCDex show failure message
etc...
Black.k.9 said:
I'm not 100% sure how to even Implement the power cards script. I've posted what I need to do, but am completely at a lost as to how to get it to work. I'm completely a first timer. I'm an idiot when it comes to doing this kind of stuff. I can easily write HTML character sheets and program macros fairly well, but when it comes to this stuff I'm completely high and dry. Like I don't even know where to begin, or even where to type out the scripting text.
Ben L. said:
Is there a way to whisper to multiple players and/or the GM? I thought I saw a thread saying it was possible, but not only does a direct search turn up nothing, but my attempts to make it work fail miserably. I'm just trying to have a a basic skills check that whispers to the GM but the actual player can't see the result. If I try to add them to the whisper command I get no output at all for anyone. I've tried using --whisper|self,GM and --whisper|@{selected|character_name},GM but neither one works.
Any thoughts?
Dave Rake said:
I love this script!!
Two questions:
1. What's the syntax for --titlefontsize| ? (I can't seem to get numbers to work here)
2. Is there any way to set subtitle colors different from the title color?
!power {{
--name|@{selected|classactionname1}
--format|skillatt
--charid|@{selected|character_id}
--emote|@{selected|character_name}
--api_token-mod|_ids @{selected|token_id} _set statusmarkers|red
--!What|Is there a red token marker?
}}This code does nothing to the token. Making the same token-mod call outside of the PowerCards script works as it should, so there is something about how PowerCards is processing the api call to the other script. Ultimately, there will be a conditional on the api_token-mod line to prevent the status marker from being changed if the character has used up their rages for the day, so I can't accomplish what I want outside of PowerCards.
Ben L. said:
I'm trying to create an easy way to handle barbarian rage in the DnD 5e character sheet, and I have everything working except for getting a status marker on the token to show the barbarian in rage mode. To avoid any other errors, I've eliminated all processing except for the desired effect here:!power {{This code does nothing to the token. Making the same token-mod call outside of the PowerCards script works as it should, so there is something about how PowerCards is processing the api call to the other script. Ultimately, there will be a conditional on the api_token-mod line to prevent the status marker from being changed if the character has used up their rages for the day, so I can't accomplish what I want outside of PowerCards.
--name|@{selected|classactionname1}
--format|skillatt
--charid|@{selected|character_id}
--emote|@{selected|character_name}
--api_token-mod|_ids @{selected|token_id} _set statusmarkers|red
--!What|Is there a red token marker?
}}
Is this a bug, or is there something I'm missing?
Danny C. said:
Hello kurt. I am trying to get the vfx_opt|@{target|token_id} explosion-slime to work but is not happening.
It seems it dont register explosion as a fx. Any intake on this?
Anthony V. said:
updating to the new test version and getting this error.
Development gistKurt J. said:
Anthony V. said:
updating to the new test version and getting this error.
I can't duplicate that error... is this from One Click or from the development gist?
Jesster said:
Is it possible to recall a number with something like [^Tag1] within another field that's being stored with a [$Tag2]? All I'm getting is a blank spot where [^Tag1] is being output, which screws up the calculations.
My setup looks like this (with the rest of the code cut out of course):
[[ [$Tag1] 1d0+?{question|no,@{attribute1} |yes,0 }]]
[[ [$Tag2] 1d0+@{attribute2}+@{attribute3}+@{attribute4}+@{attribute5}-[^Tag1.total] ]]
The 1d0 is there because it wouldn't work without a roll involved. The whole thing was working fine until I separated the query into a different line and tried to import its RollID.
CqLou said:
Hi Kurt,
Can you help me with my powercard ? ;)
I'll try to use you "--api_" but i'll can't find a good way, maybe you can tell me why (maybe it's impossible)
this is my macro :
...
Tjis is work, only need help with last part:
!attrib Combo|[[@{selected|Combo}+2]], add "Combo" value by 2.
how can i implant to my macro ? perfect way with "?? $Atk1 <= @{target|CA} OR $Atk2 >= @{target|CA} ??"
Thx for looking
!power {{
--name|Test SetAttr
--currentCombo|@{selected|Combo}
--hroll|[[ [$NewCombo] 1d0 + @{selected|Combo} + 2 ]]
--api_setattr|_charid @{selected|character_id} _Combo|[^NewCombo] _silent
}}
!power {{
--name|Test SetAttr
--currentCombo|@{selected|Combo}
--hroll|[[ [$NewCombo] 1d0 + @{selected|Combo} + 2 ]]
--?? $Atk1 <= @{target|CA} OR $Atk2 >= @{target|CA} ?? api_setattr|_charid @{selected|character_id} _Combo|[^NewCombo] _silent
}}
Anthony V. said:
Development gistKurt J. said:
Anthony V. said:
updating to the new test version and getting this error.
I can't duplicate that error... is this from One Click or from the development gist?
Kurt J. said:
CqLou said:
Hi Kurt,
Can you help me with my powercard ? ;)
I'll try to use you "--api_" but i'll can't find a good way, maybe you can tell me why (maybe it's impossible)
this is my macro :
...
Tjis is work, only need help with last part:
!attrib Combo|[[@{selected|Combo}+2]], add "Combo" value by 2.
how can i implant to my macro ? perfect way with "?? $Atk1 <= @{target|CA} OR $Atk2 >= @{target|CA} ??"
Thx for looking
The 3.7.3 and earlier versions of PowerCards actually can't do this because of the way the --api_ tag is processed. However, I just updated the development gist to 3.7.4 which includes processing of inline formatting for the --api_ tag. This means you can use RollIDs in the content (but not rolls themselves).
This now works for me with the chatsetattr script (I've never used the !attrib API script before, but I imagine it could be set up similarly):!power {{ --name|Test SetAttr --currentCombo|@{selected|Combo} --hroll|[[ [$NewCombo] 1d0 + @{selected|Combo} + 2 ]] --api_setattr|_charid @{selected|character_id} _Combo|[^NewCombo] _silent }}
If you wanted to do it conditionally, you would still make the "roll" (which doesn't roll anything, but really just adds 2 to @{selected|Combo} with the hroll line and store it in [$NewCombo], like this:!power {{ --name|Test SetAttr --currentCombo|@{selected|Combo} --hroll|[[ [$NewCombo] 1d0 + @{selected|Combo} + 2 ]] --?? $Atk1 <= @{target|CA} OR $Atk2 >= @{target|CA} ?? api_setattr|_charid @{selected|character_id} _Combo|[^NewCombo] _silent }}
Again, you would need to updated to the current 3.7.4 on the development gist for this to work.
Anthony V. said:
Development gistKurt J. said:
Anthony V. said:
updating to the new test version and getting this error.
I can't duplicate that error... is this from One Click or from the development gist?
How are you updating your API script? I go to the GIST, hit the "raw" button, hit Control-A to select all, Control-C to copy, switch over to the Roll20 API section for my game, click in the code window for PoweCards, hit Control-A, Control-V and click save. I'm not running into any issues with the development version when doing it that way.
Anthony V. said:
Having an issue with the PC action list it was rolling the wrong attack when you click the button in the chat but my API error has gone away so that’s good. Kurt J. said:Anthony V. said:
Development gistKurt J. said:
Anthony V. said:
updating to the new test version and getting this error.
I can't duplicate that error... is this from One Click or from the development gist?
How are you updating your API script? I go to the GIST, hit the "raw" button, hit Control-A to select all, Control-C to copy, switch over to the Roll20 API section for my game, click in the code window for PoweCards, hit Control-A, Control-V and click save. I'm not running into any issues with the development version when doing it that way.
Ziterman S. said:
!power {{--tokenid|@{selected|token_id}
--emote|**@{selected|token_name}** tente de trancher dans le lard de @{target|character_name}
--name|Épée longue
--leftsub|Action
--rightsub|Cac 1.5m
--Attack|[[ [$Atk] ?{Advantage?| Normal, 1d20 + [[5]] | Advantage, 2d20kh1 + [[5]] | Disadvantage, 2d20kl1 + [[5]] [PROF]]} ]] vs AC
--?? $Atk.base == 1 OR $Atk.total < @{target|AC}?? !Miss:|Echec.
--?? $Atk < @{target|AC} ?? soundfx|_play|miss
--?? $Atk >= @{target|AC} ?? soundfx|_play|Slash1
--?? $Atk.total >= @{target|AC} AND $Atk.base <> 1 AND $Atk.base <> 20 ?? Dégâts :|[[ [$Dmg] 1d8 + 3]] Dommage Tranchant
--?? $Atk >= @{target|AC} AND $Atk.base <> 20 ?? alterbar1|_target|@{target|token_id} _bar|1 _amount|-[^Dmg] _show|all
--?? $Atk.base == 20 ?? Coup critique :|[[ [$CritDmg] 2d8 +3]] Dommage Tranchant
--?? $Atk.base == 20 ?? alterbar2|_target|@{target|token_id} _bar|1 _amount|-[^CritDmg] _show|all
--Attack *2|[[ [$Atk2] ?{Advantage?| Normal, 1d20 + [[5]] | Advantage, 2d20kh1 + [[5]] | Disadvantage, 2d20kl1 + [[5]] [PROF]]} ]] vs AC
--?? $Atk2.base == 1 OR $Atk2.total < @{target|AC}?? !Miss:|Echec.
--?? $Atk2 < @{target|AC} ?? soundfx|_play|miss
--?? $Atk2 >= @{target|AC} ?? soundfx|_play|Slash1
--?? $Atk2.total >= @{target|AC} AND $Atk2.base <> 1 AND $Atk2.base <> 20 ?? Dégâts *2:|[[ [$Dmg2] 1d8 + 3]] Dommage Tranchant
--?? $Atk2 >= @{target|AC} AND $Atk2.base <> 20 ?? alterbar1|_target|@{target|token_id} _bar|1 _amount|-[^Dmg2] _show|all
--?? $Atk2.base == 20 ?? Coup critique *2:|[[ [$CritDmg2] 2d8 +3]] Dommage Tranchant
--?? $Atk2.base == 20 ?? alterbar2|_target|@{target|token_id} _bar|1 _amount|-[^CritDmg2] _show|all
}}
Anthony V. said:
Anyone else having this problem with the PC Action list?
!power {{
--name|@{selected|character_name} Stats
--format|statsgm
--whisper|GM
--leftsub|@{selected|gender} @{selected|race}
--rightsub|Level [[ [TXT] 0d0 + [[@{selected|level}]] ]] @{selected|class}**
--hroll|[[ [$SpellCaster] 0d0 + 1 ]]
--?? @{selected|bard_level} == 0 AND @{selected|cleric_level} == 0 AND @{selected|druid_level} == 0 AND @{selected|monk_level} == 0 AND @{selected|paladin_level} == 0 AND @{selected|ranger_level} == 0 AND @{selected|sorcerer_level} == 0 AND @{selected|warlock_level} == 0 AND @{selected|wizard_level} == 0 ?? hroll|[[ [$SpellCaster] 0d0 + 0 ]]
--?? $SpellCaster == 0 ?? Spellcaster? *1|No ($SpellCaster = [^SpellCaster])
--?? $SpellCaster == 1 ?? Spellcaster? *2|Yes ($SpellCaster = [^SpellCaster])
--Levels:|Bard: [[@{selected|bard_level}]] Cleric: [[@{selected|cleric_level}]] Druid: [[@{selected|druid_level}]] Monk: [[@{selected|monk_level}]] Paladin: [[@{selected|paladin_level}]] Ranger: [[@{selected|ranger_level}]] Sorcerer: [[@{selected|sorcerer_level}]] Warlock: [[@{selected|warlock_level}]] Wizard: [[@{selected|wizard_level}]]
}}The output is giving me this info: