<a href="http://thelegacyofsylver.net/ttrpg/resources/screenshot/" rel="nofollow">http://thelegacyofsylver.net/ttrpg/resources/screenshot/</a> So, I decided to put together a comparison of screenshots between the standard VTT and Jumpgate, showing the features of Treasure Town in Echoed Waves, and how different it looks between the two versions, as well as between the basic site and my custom dark mode CSS. There's also webp animations to show each one so you can see the difference between the two. Myself, I'm sticking to the standard VTT unless Jumpgate fixes the issues I have with it before Echoed Waves starts. While I would absolutely *love* to switch to Jumpgate, due to how much more optimized it is to run on browsers, and the features it adds and the way it cleans up certain things, I can't when it removes fundamental features that my campaigns use. Said features include: • Glow effects when tokens emit light (so I can have fires and lamps glow, for aesthetics). • Showing token bars when a max value isn't set (I use this to show bank balance and interest). • Smooth antialiasing (the images look choppy on Jumpgate, especially overlapping images like the sand on the ground). • Tokens with pixels below 39.9% opacity cannot have those pixels tinted (said pixels just don't change color while pixels at 39.9% or above do). While these may not seem like big issues, for my campaigns, they are, especially with how much I emphasize visuals and optimizing how things display on the map to not only look good, but also have as much information available as possible without excess clutter. I've made reports on the issues, with screenshots to show. It's up to the Roll20 devs to see about fixing them. And frankly, I don't think they will, since these are issues no one else seems to be complaining about. Which sucks, because Jumpgate has so much amazing potential to work so well with my campaigns, if it didn't have these few, but large, problems. The link above is to my own personal webserver, since I don't know how this forum compresses images, or if it does. Those who don't trust the link, I'll include an Imgur link, which doesn't have the animated webp files, since Imgur doesn't support them. <a href="https://imgur.com/a/9UFMv2w" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/9UFMv2w</a>