
Looks great. Thanks for the hard work!Scott C. said:
Ok, here's what the core page for PCs looks like. It still has a few layout issues, but this is the general idea I'm going for. Let me know what all you Starfinder fans think:
Looks great. Thanks for the hard work!Scott C. said:
Ok, here's what the core page for PCs looks like. It still has a few layout issues, but this is the general idea I'm going for. Let me know what all you Starfinder fans think:
That Cool GM said:
I would honestly just change this format into the one that is provided in the CRB and online for free. That one is far simpler to understand and doesn't seem all over the place.
Paper sheet's do not have to handle all the things that you can do on roll20. Sheet rolls, repeating sections, auto-calculations, macro-text fields, tabs, npc, spaceship, etc. Not to mention if people want more optional features... Just saying that it's difficult to have the same nice clean simple look of a pen and paper sheet and still incorporate all the cool features that we have grown to expect on roll20.Madman said:
Edit: just a personal question why do you change the layouts. Like the default sheet is compact and easy to read. this is kinda large and spaced..
kinda sad about the auto fill but hey beggers can't be choosers.
There are a couple reasons for the changed layout.Madman said:
Edit: just a personal question why do you change the layouts. Like the default sheet is compact and easy to read. this is kinda large and spaced..
kinda sad about the auto fill but hey beggers can't be choosers.
AmenGM Matt said:
(Now is a good time to remember that sheet creators put hours of thought and work into shaping the sheet, and that they do not get paid for it. These sheets are labors of love. If you have a criticism, be specific and constructive, but also be kind...)
Scott C. said:
There will be a PC, an NPC, and a starship display option. I haven't decided yet if there will be separate NPC/PC starship pages as I'm still working my way through the rules and am focusing on the PC section atm as I'm working to get the PC section up and running first.
Scott C. said:
I'm glad you like the sheet Courtney.
Everyone,
I'm all for constructive criticism of the sheet and discussion on various ways to accomplish the goal. This is indeed why I posted the previews of how it currently stands. There are more ways than I can count to play and enjoy RPGs. No one way is any more right or wrong than the other. With that in mind, let's focus the thread more on critique of the sheet, and ideas for how to make it better.
If you've got an opinion on the sheet; whether it be you love it, like it, dislike it, or hate it; give me some specific points that caused your reaction to the sheet. Simply telling me that you don't like it or that it is confusing doesn't help me improve it, and it does need improvement - this is my first sheet after all.
Thank you,
Scott C.
Courtney R. said:
I'm mixed. I feel the first is lacking in something, maybe color? But it's hard to say. Feels pretty... void. Pun aside, I mean it. It seems a bit empty. While the second does seem a bit much. Not necessarily the color, but the effect seems to be overwhelming and draws away from the sheet.
Though I'm also not liking the hard edges around the titles and boxes.
Would it be possible to get that to fit around the edges? Or round them at least?